Re: [Netconf] WGLC on zerotouch draft

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Wed, 12 September 2018 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89194130E0F for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qc6AgYoNp7TR for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:50:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB404126CC7 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id t19-v6so84591ply.13 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=PZ4dSj3nP9MxWLtZlRE5fe5iherKVeA0CK8laOXmW2E=; b=ALRVAS1qhNIZNKxsKb4/r2XF9FjqwekDR9Qn+O9bMGuPCW0ClAkUerpial12v4V5IR vSQ9qHMEG09prshFe5B8SIplF5M5WxqsEWtGAaU2M+5YmeDGQ0VUFRrmCXFCsP/ij6Nk cQoisYDO6V11E8MaE78f6g7mkcBfHxjFarib5mwZX45GpF9/cKxR68fY79hsArPdrJRS yuVlZZIXAUr37pXVjgcfQFPH1ihhPp0KtFvk5Su+r8WFie2JcRq1Td+g8Yars3Of6UNI gNeg2P6TVbO9yegw4h5kCwU9fv/NebwDHs0vD52U4n7ZnLsLQxtzNGQ/WzT9trQQnuh8 WElA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=PZ4dSj3nP9MxWLtZlRE5fe5iherKVeA0CK8laOXmW2E=; b=tbBl5xwD3bh1cIXwcwkxeldhFj7KqJFH8B68xBcPJa1EdtvHLirRwQl/QG9XqvjLO/ ZBU5W01iV8d/gUO+ZGZM5tjPt0Ws86PzD02TSEcVhKnpLMdFTJja5ynpmHPjiCQZk+GI fcWSLlme/kU1WVVGHrR/1IFQDsTrYjrWpPsPKSGmKcNktEDttOVVK77CSIUu3VxbKaL5 La0raTH9LWx2U0udz8X631gtkY5hveeORdyFGJNVM2lurwwqSFzxqbX4Ij7G3gR+Z3ET 7xTlhdRtS22c9tjz2OvqUVikNaFK4LczzpcmvFXPKcx1Fq8hcnDFem0+y2z0knaAHyrD jxrg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DEvIPrJIiFd/u4qorYIpBzTVVH0QFlZu4JVKrxwEp1wri6Uw8W haUJ3oNlvlUFntRRQiX6Tc+Hf46Z
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZ8vaT8SqqORSoqNSm1AmaSqRxd4sESzPOlpTDQo/cuXShAhsgyAOKBcZawkSMykQiWs0FHeQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b212:: with SMTP id t18-v6mr30459560plr.107.1536713454438; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:50:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.2.48.47] ([208.91.2.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v19-v6sm27796946pgn.94.2018.09.11.17.50.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <4EF52CE6-AE64-47AB-94E3-F114E41E5E28@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B736A1AD-FAB4-4925-8B9B-181D5592AC6E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 17:50:52 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20171113.155741.613591566578760847.mbj@tail-f.com>
Cc: Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
References: <E0B1AB54-C62F-40DF-8234-1844A8941E92@gmail.com> <20171102.145546.466862355235662064.mbj@tail-f.com> <9430CAD9-E45D-4AC1-BC0C-C3353AFA5085@juniper.net> <20171113.155741.613591566578760847.mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/rivJ88vVaq3FPCEY9B-Y5sssATU>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] WGLC on zerotouch draft
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 00:50:57 -0000

I do not see any e-mail or updates in the document that reflect what was finally agreed upon for this issue raised.


> On Nov 13, 2017, at 6:57 AM, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote:
> 
>>> 
>>> o  Section 5.1, item 1
>>> 
>>> Add reference to the new module ietf-zerotouch-device, maybe tweak
>>> the text?
>> 
>> I put the reference to the module up a level (Section 5) as the module
>> applies to more than just item 1.  Regarding tweaking the text, do you
>> have a suggestion?
> 
> The text has guidelines for how a vendor should define a
> "enable zerotouch" variable.  Maybe replace the text with a reference
> to the standard module instead.


Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com