Re: [Netconf] Draft Minutes of IETF 96 NETCONF Session

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Thu, 28 July 2016 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6385812D6B5 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H4GVnRxYjeDw for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from trail.lhotka.name (trail.lhotka.name [77.48.224.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF54B12DA7B for <netconf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 06:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [195.113.220.110]) by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 122121CC021B; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:11:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>, "Ersue, Mehmet (Nokia - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nokia.com>, Netconf <netconf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA752544B5@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <HE1PR0701MB2859F0D3B98BDAC1EBC823CB910E0@HE1PR0701MB2859.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <016c01d1e8bd$f3c6a580$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA752544B5@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.51.2 (x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0)
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 15:11:48 +0200
Message-ID: <m27fc5c3fv.fsf@birdie.labs.nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/slKIbKE8Visfq-bamvQeiCe4zmY>
Subject: Re: [Netconf] Draft Minutes of IETF 96 NETCONF Session
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Configuration WG mailing list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 13:18:19 -0000

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> writes:

> I agree with Tom here.

+1

Lada

>
> Regards,
>
> Dan
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Netconf [mailto:netconf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of t.petch
>> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 1:50 PM
>> To: Ersue, Mehmet (Nokia - DE/Munich); Netconf
>> Subject: Re: [Netconf] Draft Minutes of IETF 96 NETCONF Session
>> 
>> I notice that Benoit floats the idea of changing the name of the group.
>> 
>> I think that this is a bad idea.  I always think it a bad idea to overload a short,
>> simple, easy-to-use identifier with specific, time-limited semantics which try
>> to pin down the object identified.
>> 
>> The IETF is littered with examples of  this approach.  Consider, in this case,
>> what would we do with the names of I-Ds, how would we ever link future
>> incarnations with previous ones, not just of I-Ds but of minutes, wikis, and all
>> the other computer systems where NETCONF currently is used as an
>> identifier?
>> 
>> Tom Petch
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Ersue, Mehmet (Nokia - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nokia.com>
>> To: "Netconf" <netconf@ietf.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 9:38 PM
>> 
>> Dear NETCONF WG,
>> 
>> below are the draft minutes of the NETCONF session in IETF 96 meeting.
>> 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

-- 
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C