[netconf] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-22: (with COMMENT)

[Martin Duke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server-22: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-tcp-client-server/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

EDIT: with another comment spurred by a different doc.

Thanks to Michael Tuexen for the TSVART review.

I support Eric's DISCUSS about support for HTTP CONNECT proxies, though I think
MASQUE itself is not relevant here.

It's also important to indicate, probably in (2.1.5), that Keepalive MUST
(SHOULD?) NOT be activated if there is application-level keepalive, as there is
in SSH.

Nit:
(2.1.5) s/not universally accepted/not universally deployed? adopted? activated?

Accepted seems like an imprecise word here.