Re: [netconf] Question on restconf empty list reply
Olof Hagsand <olof@hagsand.se> Sun, 23 February 2020 20:01 UTC
Return-Path: <olof@hagsand.se>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE22D3A0DD9 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 12:01:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kw_AWbNI5o6k for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 12:01:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp2.outgoing.loopia.se (smtp2.outgoing.loopia.se [93.188.3.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CC333A0DD5 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 12:01:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219B52E608B1 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:01:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from s630.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0305D2E27DC9; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:01:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from s475.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.5]) by s630.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9C613ABDB1; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:01:36 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se
Received: from s498.loopia.se ([172.22.191.5]) by s475.loopia.se (s475.loopia.se [172.22.190.15]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id BV-LrmXr6V-K; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:01:36 +0100 (CET)
X-Loopia-Auth: user
X-Loopia-User: olof@hagsand.se
X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 85.227.89.255
Received: from [10.0.0.14] (ua-85-227-89-255.bbcust.telenor.se [85.227.89.255]) (Authenticated sender: olof@hagsand.se) by s498.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 60CFB470823; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:01:36 +0100 (CET)
To: "Schönwälder, Jürgen" <J.Schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
References: <4bca4ca8-0d9f-d986-4521-5c808a6e8a4d@hagsand.se> <20200223112829.rjd3zf53rybmmzvc@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
From: Olof Hagsand <olof@hagsand.se>
Message-ID: <6ed11152-ab3d-d42b-f983-908de32bbef8@hagsand.se>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:01:35 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200223112829.rjd3zf53rybmmzvc@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/tqtARPaiLaLo01ZnknzolXpzf4g>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Question on restconf empty list reply
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 20:01:45 -0000
Thank you for the answer! What does "the empty lists exists or not" mean, how is an existing empty list different from a non-existent list wrt YANG? I would think that a YANG list have instances (= it exists), or it does not have instances (= is empty = does not exist). Another related question is how the same request but for XML encoding should be treated, ie a YANG list x with no elements (empty list/non-existent)? GET /restconf/data/m:x Accept: application/yang-data+xml Is the reply "404 Not Found" status-line and error-tag value "invalid-value" (following the list resource doe snot exist) or, following the JSON [] (existing empty list) reasoning, a "204 No Content"? Again apologizes for these basic questions, Regards, Olof Hagsand On 2020-02-23 12:28, Schönwälder, Jürgen wrote: > My reading of RFC 7951 section 5.4 is that an empty list results in an > empty JSON array. A related question is likely whether the empty list > exists or not. RFC 8040 says a 404 response indicates that the > resource does not exist (or is not accessible). So both responses may > be reasonable, depending on the existence/accessibility of the resource. > > /js > > On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 12:12:58PM +0100, Olof Hagsand wrote: >> Hello, >> In a restconf GET request of an empty YANG list using JSON encoding, >> what is the expected reply? I.e. using a yang list "x" in module "m" >> (pseudo http): >> GET /restconf/data/m:x >> Accept: application/yang-data+json >> >> Is the reply (1): >> HTTP/1.1 200 OK >> { >> "m:x": [] >> } >> >> or should it be (2) >> "404 Not Found" status-line and error-tag value "invalid-value"? >> >> Apologizes that this is a basic question, and I am sure this is resolved >> properly, but we have some discussions with users on how to properly >> interpret the description of GET in RFC 8040 Section 4.3 and RFC 7951. >> >> Regards, >> Olof Hagsand, >> Clixon maintainer >> >> _______________________________________________ >> netconf mailing list >> netconf@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf >
- [netconf] Question on restconf empty list reply Olof Hagsand
- Re: [netconf] Question on restconf empty list rep… Schönwälder
- Re: [netconf] Question on restconf empty list rep… Olof Hagsand
- Re: [netconf] Question on restconf empty list rep… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netconf] Question on restconf empty list rep… Martin Björklund
- Re: [netconf] Question on restconf empty list rep… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netconf] Question on restconf empty list rep… Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
- Re: [netconf] Question on restconf empty list rep… Martin Björklund
- Re: [netconf] Question on restconf empty list rep… Martin Björklund
- Re: [netconf] Question on restconf empty list rep… Olof Hagsand
- Re: [netconf] Question on restconf empty list rep… Kent Watsen