IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netconf] Pullback tcp-client-server also?

Wim Henderickx <wim.henderickx@gmail.com> Thu, 21 March 2024 02:36 UTC

Return-Path: <wim.henderickx@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C70C14F6A8 for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 19:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FAKE_REPLY_B=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uc6GOm6L9opf for <netconf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 19:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62c.google.com (mail-pl1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8258AC14F685 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 19:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1e04ac200a6so4247675ad.1 for <netconf@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 19:35:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710988557; x=1711593357; darn=ietf.org; h=to:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=g9OSagmDWdBipEH1IT/iMvd83vPhZhqyFvlYROMxOjw=; b=BOPLqzFimAvxssk7pULgZhmmadkIPDn4htg3+3282cMX0OEt29TEUJ2/HJ+Uoq0eMl uubruGUMYMWwfIFpTujJmKzNlsRIkWnaA5NiSZOp3xcHYXDb1Ncj85P+Q74yzFYGm9t/ 8gnhN4d8evPRfxcKW7e/EZBWBlwYxsLoS6YrY1EfJU4ZljBoRdFwsA8oL9mGtq3apt4H W+0HEs4zuDcouExjrNPCKJpNI18kE06t8X8BZ3vC/5JPtH4PrnC9w3TAe7/0/4jF/aRs p22pBNzo/EqGeHODBRFEk00L/8COs8s/CWX4pQjL9tMYUf0AzOXsCs+3g7Oh5Ktkkqe+ P3Zg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710988557; x=1711593357; h=to:date:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=g9OSagmDWdBipEH1IT/iMvd83vPhZhqyFvlYROMxOjw=; b=TFgRwq9+jEv81csF8UHZB3IbeQHMS3Bcr97es7MQiFJQ+fB5YUBiIa2Zy9enL9j8kA mHq65rYZ1hjZRsWuFOGoQOKaKoDwta14OcdGS8YKUDq7l4bQb9KTPee6JblToHMDT2o3 wgc37WHStEv2S8o9MlPBQZvzl00WCf6wHaJwJBfY9POYIQ0VrHKbkhyBGSgL/wNsvM1A jfFA5+og7PxRSO3acTQlYPz9fGi/eMW4xBKYoykkf4pnCIGci4QXgw8yDjAw9xPlvjs5 i9QQUbIvEFJlktQ3BWXvk6hNv6V8WN4pBSSSiAeuxwBADqBGFP+8FH4cW3NYEv1w0yFF w6gQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwPBt26Bo2PMspPPCDn7qBgX++4uBZjgBc6plHTNk7AyackxRen 3JlUWgS7Lmh4S7DBdpCCtaT8eLE0jUhE14zfUqAk+9X43czP1YjbPl8NB6koDko=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGprMUoH23WgYQRee37DNWZBzlk8Oyuq7tIYn7Wtxnp268h8dKuSBwzs98DJm646IT2wm6Nrg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a3c4:b0:1df:f859:91b6 with SMTP id q4-20020a170902a3c400b001dff85991b6mr1490332plb.34.1710988557094; Wed, 20 Mar 2024 19:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([59.154.62.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a6-20020a170902ecc600b001dffe8a22aesm9808901plh.262.2024.03.20.19.35.55 for <netconf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Mar 2024 19:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wim Henderickx <wim.henderickx@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
Message-Id: <C4200C7E-8072-48A7-ACA6-4F1C7F307EF9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 12:35:40 +1000
To: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/vQO6pMJvG0bUHi9piJgvtZZ7yrY>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Pullback tcp-client-server also?
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 02:36:00 -0000

Sorry to chime in late, but I getting on the plane right now.

Coming back on the TCP or UDP ipv4/ipv6. From my experience what can happen is this:

- You open a server on a port and you can bind it to ipv4 or ipv6 or dual-stack. If you want to open another service on a separate port you create a new socket/server. Now this could be done in the same forwarding instance or a separate one (aka VRF).

I have not looked in the model in detail, but this is what I see could practically be implemented.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email