Re: [netconf] Shepherd review on draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server-26
"maqiufang (A)" <maqiufang1@huawei.com> Thu, 20 October 2022 12:10 UTC
Return-Path: <maqiufang1@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netconf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE32C14F73F; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 05:10:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n9vk-zzuJKF7; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 05:10:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85BA8C152593; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 05:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml705-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.201]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4MtRDq3SRqz67kSQ; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:07:39 +0800 (CST)
Received: from kwepemm600019.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.64) by fraeml705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2375.31; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 14:08:45 +0200
Received: from kwepemm600017.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.234) by kwepemm600019.china.huawei.com (7.193.23.64) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:08:44 +0800
Received: from kwepemm600017.china.huawei.com ([7.193.23.234]) by kwepemm600017.china.huawei.com ([7.193.23.234]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.031; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 20:08:44 +0800
From: "maqiufang (A)" <maqiufang1@huawei.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
CC: "draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server@ietf.org>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netconf] Shepherd review on draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server-26
Thread-Index: AdjBnjN4COvm2QUbRXOkxoqK/Zr21AiNazyAACopybA=
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 12:08:44 +0000
Message-ID: <e5ad6da99a484fc4869c90efb1968ae7@huawei.com>
References: <58bb380efce9495aaaa7a4098154ecdd@huawei.com> <01000183f2b0c6f9-c88128da-599c-48af-8667-8ad1a999d32b-000000@email.amazonses.com>
In-Reply-To: <01000183f2b0c6f9-c88128da-599c-48af-8667-8ad1a999d32b-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.100.87]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_e5ad6da99a484fc4869c90efb1968ae7huaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/y8dtT0C9IkR8UCrEBN7-XghnsDM>
Subject: Re: [netconf] Shepherd review on draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server-26
X-BeenThere: netconf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF WG list <netconf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netconf/>
List-Post: <mailto:netconf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf>, <mailto:netconf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 12:10:29 -0000
Hi, Kent Thanks for clarification and resolving my comments. The proposed update looks good to me. The shepherd write up has been update and is now available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server/shepherdwriteup/. Happy to receive any comments. Best Regards, Qiufang From: Kent Watsen [mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net] Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2022 8:00 AM To: maqiufang (A) <maqiufang1@huawei.com> Cc: draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server@ietf.org; netconf@ietf.org Subject: Re: [netconf] Shepherd review on draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-client-server-26 Hi Qiufang, Hi, all I am glad to be the doc shepherd for this draft as it moves beyond the WG with the other client-server suite of drafts. Thank you for your valuable comments! As part of my shepherd writeup, I’ve read the latest version of the draft and have got some comments, which I hope could be resolved before progressing the document. Please find my responses to your comments below, and see the just-posted updated draft.. Thanks. Best Regards, Qiufang Kent Comments: · Sec.2.3 YANG Module o The author information should be updated o s/load balanacer/load balancer/ o The description for feature "http-listen": s/https-listen/http-listen/ All fixed - thanks! · o · Sec.3.1.1 Features o Both a client and a server have defined a http-listen feature in the YANG modules; my confusion is that, if a server supports http-listen feature, why doesn’t the client support the http-initiate feature? In other words, if a client supports http-listen feature, why doesn’t the server support the http-call-home? If I understand your question, the reason because the client and server may be implemented by different vendors, or by the same vendor and deployed with different settings. Makes sense? · Sec.3.3 YANG Module o The author information is inconsistent Fixed. · o · Sec.4 Security Considerations o s/NETCONF access control model (NACM)/ Network access control model (NACM)/ (applied for both 4.1 and 4.2) Fixed (per your netconf-client-server review) · o · Sec.5.2 The "YANG Module Names" Registry o s/prefix: ncc/prefix: rcc/ o s/prefix: ncs/prefix: rcs/ Fixed. · o · Sec.6. Informative References o Draft-ietf-restconf-client-server is self-referenced. Fixed (per your netconf-client-server review) Once everything settles, please update the Shepherd write-up posted to Datatracker to reflect an "all good" report (assuming that is true). Thanks again, Kent
- [netconf] Shepherd review on draft-ietf-netconf-r… maqiufang (A)
- Re: [netconf] Shepherd review on draft-ietf-netco… Kent Watsen
- Re: [netconf] Shepherd review on draft-ietf-netco… maqiufang (A)
- Re: [netconf] Shepherd review on draft-ietf-netco… tom petch
- Re: [netconf] Shepherd review on draft-ietf-netco… Kent Watsen