[netext] use-cases of draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support
<pierrick.seite@orange.com> Tue, 07 February 2012 11:07 UTC
Return-Path: <pierrick.seite@orange.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D7121F852C for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 03:07:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uUQku6eCbPEq for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 03:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2C121F84D6 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 03:07:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id B926AE302C1 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:07:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47A3E302A6 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:07:58 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.56]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 7 Feb 2012 12:07:21 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:07:20 +0100
Message-ID: <843DA8228A1BA74CA31FB4E111A5C462022B3DA6@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: use-cases of draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support
Thread-Index: AczliKlCnkdcjYMARrmv0/IHxEYr7Q==
From: pierrick.seite@orange.com
To: netext@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Feb 2012 11:07:22.0172 (UTC) FILETIME=[AA42CFC0:01CCE588]
Subject: [netext] use-cases of draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:07:25 -0000
Hi Tele and Sri, The WG has decided to specify the flow mobility without LMA-Initiated handover. However, section 6 (use-cases) of draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support focuses only on LMA-initiated handover. I'm not saying that LMA-Initiated use-case is irrelevant and I've no problem to include it in the document dealing with LI support. But for the sake of consistency with the solution draft, I think that draft-ietf-netext-logical-interface-support should also cover MN-initiated handovers. What do you think? BR, Pierrick
- [netext] use-cases of draft-ietf-netext-logical-i… pierrick.seite
- Re: [netext] use-cases of draft-ietf-netext-logic… Sri Gundavelli
- Re: [netext] use-cases of draft-ietf-netext-logic… pierrick.seite