[netext] Question about EAP method applicability..
<Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com> Thu, 26 April 2012 15:54 UTC
Return-Path: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE11121E8106 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kYwxjTWTlz73 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:54:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mgw-sa01.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.1.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CB621E80FC for <netext@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:54:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com (in-mx.nokia.com [10.160.244.31]) by mgw-sa01.nokia.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q3QFsgem017454; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:54:43 +0300
Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.26]) by vaebh105.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:54:42 +0300
Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-073.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.3.103]) by 008-AM1MMR1-010.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.26]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.004; Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:54:36 +0200
From: Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com
To: draft-ietf-netext-wifi-epc-eap-attributes@tools.ietf.org
Thread-Topic: Question about EAP method applicability..
Thread-Index: AQHNI8TgTOe3Cl3hpki519w/mfYVwQ==
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:54:35 +0000
Message-ID: <CBBED9EE.1DC4D%basavaraj.patil@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.120402
x-originating-ip: [96.226.49.179]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <290D98B629F2D9499E0616CD219C5E41@mgd.nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Apr 2012 15:54:42.0774 (UTC) FILETIME=[E5182760:01CD23C4]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: netext@ietf.org
Subject: [netext] Question about EAP method applicability..
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 15:54:48 -0000
Hello, The I-D mentions EAP methods EAP-AKA/AKA'. Subsequent emails have also mentioned EAP-SIM. The above set of EAP methods are generally applicable in a 3GPP operator environment. Question: Are these attributes also valid for example if the EAP method used is EAP-TLS or EAP-TTLS? It would make the applicability of these attributes wider if that is the case. -Raj
- [netext] Question about EAP method applicability.. Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [netext] Question about EAP method applicabil… Behcet Sarikaya