[netext] Request for comments on draft-tu-netext-mn-status-option-02
tu.yangwei@zte.com.cn Tue, 10 July 2012 08:43 UTC
Return-Path: <tu.yangwei@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393D521F85CE for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:43:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.238
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.238 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_33=0.6, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SJbXM+0Jmukr for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx6.zte.com.cn [95.130.199.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B6C21F85A1 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 01:43:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 286201465182496; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:36:44 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.30.3.20] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 67558.1465182496; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:43:39 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse01.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id q6A8hcBd063905 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:43:38 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from tu.yangwei@zte.com.cn)
To: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 36AB452F:B1506D61-48257A37:002AC34A; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OF36AB452F.B1506D61-ON48257A37.002AC34A-48257A37.00307054@zte.com.cn>
From: tu.yangwei@zte.com.cn
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 16:43:37 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 8.5.1FP4|July 25, 2010) at 2012-07-10 16:43:40, Serialize complete at 2012-07-10 16:43:40
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0030705248257A37_="
X-MAIL: mse01.zte.com.cn q6A8hcBd063905
Subject: [netext] Request for comments on draft-tu-netext-mn-status-option-02
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:43:24 -0000
Dear all, We have submitted a new version of draft-tu-netext-mn-status-option, and you can find the URL below. This draft was previously presented in the IETF 82# meeting, and some good comments were received. To meet those comments, we add some descriptions for use case scenarios and MAG&LMA considerations. We also defines new options allowing the network getting information about mobile node capabilities in this version. Please kindly provide your comments and suggestions, and your help will be truly appreciated. BR, Yangwei Tu ----------------------------------------------------------------- A new version of I-D, draft-tu-netext-mn-status-option-02.txt has been successfully submitted by Yangwei Tu and posted to the IETF repository. Filename: draft-tu-netext-mn-status-option Revision: 02 Title: MN Status Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6 Creation date: 2012-07-09 WG ID: Individual Submission Number of pages: 10 URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tu-netext-mn-status-option-02.txt Status: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-tu-netext-mn-status-option Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tu-netext-mn-status-option-02 Diff: http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-tu-netext-mn-status-option-02 Abstract: IP flow mobility enables the ability of movement of selected flows from one access technology to another. This document extends the Proxy Mobile IPv6 signaling to convey mobile node's status information that can be used by the network to decide when and how perform flow mobility. It also defines options allowing the network getting information about different mobile node capabilities, which might be considered to decide how to tackle the node's mobility.