[netext] FW: Consensus call on adopting I-D draft-liebsch-netext-pmip6-qos as WG document

Ahmad Muhanna <amuhanna@awardsolutions.com> Wed, 23 May 2012 23:13 UTC

Return-Path: <amuhanna@awardsolutions.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67E921F8611 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 16:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AnpH1r9gjiJr for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 May 2012 16:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod8og120.obsmtp.com (exprod8og120.obsmtp.com [64.18.3.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A857021F8610 for <netext@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 May 2012 16:13:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.awardsolutions.com ([66.142.250.98]) (using TLSv1) by exprod8ob120.postini.com ([64.18.7.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT71vDOS957ko9cnt9nlpQho1CmQmZqT1@postini.com; Wed, 23 May 2012 16:13:20 PDT
Received: from REDWOOD.usa.awardsolutions.com ([fe80::49e1:b469:c7ad:bab1]) by Redwood.usa.awardsolutions.com ([fe80::49e1:b469:c7ad:bab1%11]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Wed, 23 May 2012 18:13:16 -0500
From: Ahmad Muhanna <amuhanna@awardsolutions.com>
To: "netext@ietf.org" <netext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netext] Consensus call on adopting I-D draft-liebsch-netext-pmip6-qos as WG document
Thread-Index: AQHNOTfAh3ZKhDnj+0SkGPwfbh6S85bX/4iA
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 23:13:15 +0000
Message-ID: <3359F724933DFD458579D24EAC7690987A4CDA@Redwood.usa.awardsolutions.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.25.208.82]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3359F724933DFD458579D24EAC7690987A4CDARedwoodusaawardso_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [netext] FW: Consensus call on adopting I-D draft-liebsch-netext-pmip6-qos as WG document
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 23:14:33 -0000

Hello Chairs,

I believe this draft is quite needed to fill the gap in the suite of extensions that are needed for a successful PMIPv6 deployment.

Thus:
I support the adoption of this draft as a working group document.

Regards,
Ahmad Muhanna


From: <Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com<mailto:Basavaraj.Patil@nokia.com>>
Date: May 23, 2012 2:01:52 PM CDT
To: <netext@ietf.org<mailto:netext@ietf.org>>
Subject: [netext] Consensus call on adopting I-D draft-liebsch-netext-pmip6-qos as WG document
Hello,

The authors of the I-D: Quality of Service Option for Proxy Mobile IPv6
<draft-liebsch-netext-pmip6-qos>
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-liebsch-netext-pmip6-qos-01.txt

have requested the adoption of this I-D as a WG document.
The I-D itself has been presented at IETF83 and has also been reviewed by
multiple WG members.

The crux of the proposal is to extend PMIP6 signaling to enable support
for QoS.

Abstract

  This specification defines a new mobility option that can be used by
  the mobility entities in the Proxy Mobile IPv6 domain to exchange
  Quality of Service parameters associated with a subscriber's IP
  flows.  Using the QoS option, the local mobility anchor and the
  mobile access gateway can exchange available QoS attributes and
  associated values.  This enables QoS policing and labeling of packets
  to enforce QoS differentiation on the path between the local mobility
  anchor and the mobile access gateway.  Furthermore, making QoS
  parameters available on the MAG enables mapping these parameters to
  QoS rules being specific to the access technology which operates
  below the mobile access gateway.  After such mapping, QoS rules can
  be enforced on the access technology components, such as an IEEE
  802.11e Wireless LAN controller.


Please review the I-D and respond by June 6th with your opinion.
Respond to the following question:

Should the Netext WG adopt this I-D as a WG document?

Yes   [X]
No    [  ]

Thank you.
-Chairs

_______________________________________________
netext mailing list
netext@ietf.org<mailto:netext@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext