[netext] pmip-cp-up-separation

Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@yegin.org> Fri, 16 August 2013 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <alper.yegin@yegin.org>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3FE21F9B60 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 06:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r+2cs6SgMRke for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 06:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.195]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7AE11E8110 for <netext@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 06:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.49] (88.247.135.202.static.ttnet.com.tr [88.247.135.202]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus0) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MO8WC-1VDdK90fIK-005cnd; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:19:46 -0400
From: Alper Yegin <alper.yegin@yegin.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C7A5A138-084A-43AC-A382-121D912DE5E4"
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:19:44 +0300
In-Reply-To: <403097963.25.1375348000874.JavaMail.tcastaldi@dell-tcastaldi>
To: netext@ietf.org
References: <403097963.25.1375348000874.JavaMail.tcastaldi@dell-tcastaldi>
Message-Id: <519C700B-A14D-49ED-995A-DCCE5712B919@yegin.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:uDxP8Hb38sD9QBRpvUc+gzJw+J0uj1+ojjqPp8My22g 4isd9km6cTMhl4SZ3bSKKUaeMNoYNzf5ISO5UCwDY2Z+TFeaUG I94XK1xrmAI+MzDfqvKKHeXNVVdiDMyVh4ZUETcrN6eVEg7Iir JfWHZNNrXwfdsRzITcVRYdE2HxH50Gy3vZobOyEnvfcAkrQef8 ijvfVb3Mx+emY3U+vNN5feCjfGBwnc7q3j7AErV5lIoosdwzpG hG9YHGsadmcVXUs6/KAfK7fHzWM9WFp7qnCmUOXjRAN/mloL/c mFhvMvVq+VJWP31A+sAnU33JqSKaajUlP/xII+wqmgcZIlnzi1 RxvS5C79Qmcrz+tZia14vmxZipmFvqiuoI8bSlpfZLiSmRB66T NOG41zMHN/zXA==
Subject: [netext] pmip-cp-up-separation
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:19:58 -0000

LMA User Plane Address Mobility Option is only used with the PBA.
If the MAG has prior info about the LMA-UPA, it could also provide that in PBU.
Should we allow that new option with PBU as well?

Alper