[netext] Errata on RFC 5213
Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Tue, 28 February 2012 20:40 UTC
Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B7221F8674 for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:40:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.547
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.547 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DCVrzetaPKeT for <netext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:40:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC83521F8672 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:40:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yhpp34 with SMTP id p34so1310976yhp.31 for <netext@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:40:07 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sarikaya2012@gmail.com designates 10.236.191.134 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.191.134;
Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sarikaya2012@gmail.com designates 10.236.191.134 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sarikaya2012@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=sarikaya2012@gmail.com
Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.191.134]) by 10.236.191.134 with SMTP id g6mr30523412yhn.95.1330461607420 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:40:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oY4HIICi5BTEKNp5bXxhiXFIFUR3PGMBC7i+h0OlEWw=; b=FabFbJVkEeJjw3YivT2zoZtwpvKsS+oxqba5HmEGpJ45PCLnUPLgNKmBdadWXkbAOP ii105KjWDaLXWgvZ4l7PYT3tV4RL3T2inCJVhrdNBYacIDJynhd5hm7Ae/lrdEbL9iAw gCU+2IXa5EEMQFxSfmexb/GEKlR4gM5GePDFo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.191.134 with SMTP id g6mr23116540yhn.95.1330461607379; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:40:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.236.9.73 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:40:07 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:40:07 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcexDHM99R-3FP9sJ20orQbZeoy=y91RLvFipxqhTR=kCw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: netext@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Subject: [netext] Errata on RFC 5213
X-BeenThere: netext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: "Mailing list for discusion of extensions to network mobility protocol, i.e PMIP6. " <netext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netext>
List-Post: <mailto:netext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext>, <mailto:netext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:40:08 -0000
Hi all, I would like to claim errate on RFC 5213 as follows: In Section 8.1 on Mobility Options, the paragraph: As per this specification, the following mobility options are valid in a Proxy Binding Update message. These options can be present in the message in any order. There can be one or more instances of the Home Network Prefix options present in the message. However, there cannot be more than one instance of any of the following options. Mobile Node Identifier option Home Network Prefix option Handoff Indicator option Access Technology Type option Timestamp option Mobile Node Link-layer Identifier option Link-local Address option While the text allows one or more instances of HNP, the list that just follows does not. I think that Home Network Prefix option should be deleted from the list. How to report this errata to IETF? Regards, Behcet
- [netext] Errata on RFC 5213 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [netext] Errata on RFC 5213 Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [netext] Errata on RFC 5213 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [netext] Errata on RFC 5213 Basavaraj.Patil
- Re: [netext] Errata on RFC 5213 Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [netext] Errata on RFC 5213 Sri Gundavelli