RE: [netlmm] Network-based mobility - NETLMMDT Solution VsAsolutionbased on MIP6
"Soliman, Hesham" <hsoliman@qualcomm.com> Sat, 28 October 2006 13:58 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gdohp-0005YS-TU; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:58:37 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gdoho-0005Vb-Q9 for netlmm@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:58:36 -0400
Received: from ithilien.qualcomm.com ([129.46.51.59]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gdohm-0007fX-TI for netlmm@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 09:58:36 -0400
Received: from sabrina.qualcomm.com (sabrina.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.150]) by ithilien.qualcomm.com (8.13.6/8.12.5/1.0) with ESMTP id k9SDwWeT008353 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 28 Oct 2006 06:58:33 -0700
Received: from NAEXBR04.na.qualcomm.com (naexbr04.qualcomm.com [10.46.141.42]) by sabrina.qualcomm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/1.0) with ESMTP id k9SDwUmu014681; Sat, 28 Oct 2006 06:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sanexcas01.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.36.175]) by NAEXBR04.na.qualcomm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 28 Oct 2006 06:58:29 -0700
Received: from NAEX16.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.6.158]) by sanexcas01.na.qualcomm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sat, 28 Oct 2006 06:58:30 -0700
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: [netlmm] Network-based mobility - NETLMMDT Solution VsAsolutionbased on MIP6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 06:58:29 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Message-ID: <2309978910A6A6478C2C7585692B0AF40150BD@NAEX16.na.qualcomm.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [netlmm] Network-based mobility - NETLMMDT Solution VsAsolutionbased on MIP6
Thread-Index: Acb6FujGuG126N3IRVSzqNAiU8F0WQAQnXuQ
From: "Soliman, Hesham" <hsoliman@qualcomm.com>
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>, "Narayanan, Vidya" <vidyan@qualcomm.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Oct 2006 13:58:30.0482 (UTC) FILETIME=[26389320:01C6FA99]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Cc: netlmm@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Henrik, > There were many solutions input to the design team. The > design team has > tried to do good work, and offered its best to the working > group. => I don't doubt that the DT has tried to do its best. The question is: If you agree PMIP was one of the inputs (do you agree with that?) then why not tell us the reasons for not choosing it? If you simply didn't consider it, then that's fine too, it'll be good to know that though. The > design team has nothing to prove or disprove. It has simply > attempted > to offer good work for consideration. => Sure, but it'd be nice to know if something was considered and rejected. I don't think anyone is legally obliged to tell us that, but it'd be good to know... Hesham _______________________________________________ netlmm mailing list netlmm@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
- RE: [netlmm] Network-based mobility - NETLMMDT So… Soliman, Hesham
- Re: [netlmm] Network-based mobility - NETLMMDT So… Henrik Levkowetz