Re: [netlmm] Comments on draft-giaretta-netlmm-dt-protocol-02

"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Fri, 06 October 2006 17:38 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVteG-0001GP-Ol; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 13:38:12 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVteF-0001GJ-Jq for netlmm@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 13:38:11 -0400
Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVteE-0000Wg-6w for netlmm@ietf.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2006 13:38:11 -0400
Message-ID: <028e01c6e96e$6e2a5420$586015ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com>
From: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, Julien Laganier <julien.IETF@laposte.net>, Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
References: <39C363776A4E8C4A94691D2BD9D1C9A10177437E@XCH-NW-7V2.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Subject: Re: [netlmm] Comments on draft-giaretta-netlmm-dt-protocol-02
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 10:39:52 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 3.1 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: f607d15ccc2bc4eaf3ade8ffa8af02a0
Cc: netlmm@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org

I'll see if I can find some information on this.

            jak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>; "Julien Laganier" 
<julien.IETF@laposte.net>; "Henrik Levkowetz" <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Cc: <netlmm@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: [netlmm] Comments on draft-giaretta-netlmm-dt-protocol-02


Thanks for citing the examples in this message and your
previous James, but I am concerned about handover latencies.
Taking VLAN over Ethernet as an example, can you provide
references/data that show evidence of voice-quality
handover capability?

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com

-----Original Message-----
From: James Kempf [mailto:kempf@docomolabs-usa.com]
Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 10:17 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Julien Laganier; Henrik Levkowetz
Cc: netlmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netlmm] Comments on draft-giaretta-netlmm-dt-protocol-02

It requires the ability to either transfer or re-establish a virtual p2p

link when the mobile node moves to a new link. An example is how 3gpp2
networks transfer the PPP link from a terminal to the PDSN when a
terminal
moves between PDSNs. Note that I am not saying that this is required for

NETLMM, just that it is an existence proof. There are other possible
Layer 2
technologies that could be used to establish a virtual p2p link.

            jak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: "James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>; "Julien Laganier"
<julien.IETF@laposte.net>; "Henrik Levkowetz" <henrik@levkowetz.com>
Cc: <netlmm@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 11:43 AM
Subject: RE: [netlmm] Comments on draft-giaretta-netlmm-dt-protocol-02


> Why do you think that would restrict mobility?

Maybe give some examples of the mobility scenarios you
have in mind for how a virtual p2p link configured over
a shared link is established/deprecated on behalf of a MN?

Fred
fred.l.templin@boeing.com


_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm