RE: [netlmm] Consensus call to makedraft-giaretta-netlmm-dt-protocol-02.txt a WG draft

"Silverton Aron-C1710C" <Aron.J.Silverton@motorola.com> Tue, 10 October 2006 20:05 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXNqd-0007WP-6T; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:05:07 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXNqb-0007WK-Gu for netlmm@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:05:05 -0400
Received: from mail125.messagelabs.com ([85.158.136.35]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXNqa-0000md-32 for netlmm@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:05:05 -0400
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: Aron.J.Silverton@motorola.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-125.messagelabs.com!1160510698!17017415!1
X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.10.7; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [129.188.136.8]
Received: (qmail 29568 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2006 20:04:59 -0000
Received: from motgate8.mot.com (HELO motgate8.mot.com) (129.188.136.8) by server-11.tower-125.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 10 Oct 2006 20:04:59 -0000
Received: from il06exr01.mot.com (il06exr01.mot.com [129.188.137.131]) by motgate8.mot.com (8.12.11/Motorola) with ESMTP id k9AK4w3s018384 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:04:58 -0700 (MST)
Received: from de01exm68.ds.mot.com (de01exm68.am.mot.com [10.176.8.24]) by il06exr01.mot.com (8.13.5/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k9AK4w8Y013809 for <netlmm@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:04:58 -0500 (CDT)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [netlmm] Consensus call to makedraft-giaretta-netlmm-dt-protocol-02.txt a WG draft
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 16:04:56 -0400
Message-ID: <C089A1D88F85E84B9051FF4C97B574F6012D5891@de01exm68.ds.mot.com>
In-Reply-To: <05ee01c6e89a$25728e70$456015ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [netlmm] Consensus call to makedraft-giaretta-netlmm-dt-protocol-02.txt a WG draft
thread-index: AcbomgQCKrnasrRRS2KfJEXyYesF6QEDSs5Q
From: Silverton Aron-C1710C <Aron.J.Silverton@motorola.com>
To: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>, netlmm@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0a7aa2e6e558383d84476dc338324fab
Cc:
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org

James,

I am in favor of making this a WG draft.  I see no reason why any other
discussions currently taking place on the list should impede this.  I'm
sure that there will be plenty of time for discussion after this becomes
a WG draft.

Regards,

Aron

----Original Message----
From: James Kempf [mailto:kempf@docomolabs-usa.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 11:20 AM
To: netlmm@ietf.org
Subject: [netlmm] Consensus call to
makedraft-giaretta-netlmm-dt-protocol-02.txt a WG draft 

> Folks,
> 
> Henrik has done a super job in editing the results of the interim
> meeting 
> into the DT draft, keeping the list informed all the while. So, now
> it's 
> time to consider whether to make the draft a WG draft. Please take a
> look at 
> the draft and send a posting to the list with your opinion. You can
> find the 
> draft here:
> 
>
http://www1.tools.ietf.org/wg/netlmm/dt-draft/draft-giaretta-netlmm-dt-p
rotocol-02.txt
> 
> until it is posted in the Internet Drafts repository.
> 
> Please remember that this consensus call is only whether or not to
> make the 
> draft a WG draft, and that this decision does not lock in the current
> text. 
> After a draft becomes a WG draft, it is still subject to discussion
> and 
> modification based on WG consensus; in fact, it is expected that WG
> members 
> take the time and make the effort to review the draft and make sure
> there 
> are no technical problems.
> 
> The consenus call will remain open for a week until next Thurs. Oct.
> 12. 
> Please try to post your opinion before then.
> 
>             jak
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netlmm mailing list
> netlmm@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm