Re: [netlmm] Consensus Call on WG Document Adoption

[Ashutosh Dutta <[e-mail]>]

Dear Chairs,
              I think both the drafts, draft-sgundave-mip6-proxymip6-02 
and draft-singh-netlmm-protocol-02 in their current form, demonstrate 
certain distinct features that are worth considering for a well defined 
NETLMM protocol. It is also needless to say that both the drafts, 
although at the early stage, have some overlapping ideas since they all 
try to solve the same problem.

However, I am not sure  about the logistics of harmonizing the ideas 
from both the drafts that will help to create a document that addresses 
all the issues NETLMM WG should consider for further progress leading to 
a successful deployment in a timely manner.

Do we need to keep in mind about the requirement from other SODs while 
coming up with the NETLMM protocol?

Regards
Ashutosh


Narayanan, Vidya wrote:
> All,
> This is a consensus call to pick a WG document for PMIPv6. Please
> indicate your preference in using draft-sgundave-mip6-proxymip6-02 or
> draft-singh-netlmm-protocol-01 as a starting point for the WG document.
> Please note that any document chosen as the WG document will have to
> reflect WG consensus - so, the current version need not be considered
> final by any means. If you think one or both these documents still have
> any major open issues, please state those issues on the list as well. 
> 
> Please send an email stating your preference by 23th March, 2007. If you
> don't have an adequate idea of the drafts, you may wait to see the
> presentation of the drafts at the NETLMM meeting in Prague before you
> respond to this call. 
> 
> Thanks,
> The Chairs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netlmm mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm