RE: [netlmm] Situation with NETLMM IPR disclosures

Every disclosure is worded differently and we encourage everyone to read
all the disclosures and write to the list if there are any concerns. 

Thanks,
Vidya 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vijay Devarapalli [mailto:vijay.devarapalli@azairenet.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 3:11 AM
> To: Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo)
> Cc: netlmm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [netlmm] Situation with NETLMM IPR disclosures
> 
> This is a minefield. :)
> 
> I am fine as long as there are RAND statements available in 
> all the disclosures.
> 
> Vijay
> 
> Soininen Jonne (NSN FI/Espoo) wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> > 
> > There is now a series of IPR disclosures made by different 
> parties in 
> > the IETF IPR page. Some of these disclosures are directly 
> to relative 
> > specs and some indirectly. They are listed in the following (thanks 
> > for Vidya for digging up the information).
> > 
> > Third party disclosure on draft-sgundave-mip6-proxymip6:
> > 
> http://www.ietf.org/ietf/IPR/jak-3rd-party-ipr-draft-sgudavemip6-proxy
> > mi
> > p6.txt
> > 
> > Disclosures on draft-sgundave-mip6-proxymip6:
> > 
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cgi?ipr_id=807
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cgi?ipr_id=822
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cgi?ipr_id=756
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cgi?ipr_id=834
> > 
> > Disclosures on draft-singh-netlmm-protocol:
> > 
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cgi?ipr_id=816
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cgi?ipr_id=835
> > 
> > Disclosures on other related network-based mobility protocols:
> > 
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cgi?ipr_id=836
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/ipr_detail_show.cgi?ipr_id=837
> > 
> > The working group should consider these and decide how to 
> take these 
> > disclosures into account if in any way.
> > 
> > <chair hat off>I would (personally - not as a chair) 
> however recommend 
> > to think hard before starting to work around the protected 
> technology. 
> > The mobility area is pretty thoroughly researched in many different 
> > organizations over the years and trying to work around one IPR can 
> > land you directly on another. </chair hat off>
> > 
> > Obviously, this is ultimately the WGs decision and the consensus of 
> > the WG is what decides.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Jonne.
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netlmm mailing list
> netlmm@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm
> 

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm