IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netlmm] Is DAD needed for MN-HoA in PMIPv6

Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> Mon, 21 May 2007 19:23 UTC

Return-path: <netlmm-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HqDTf-0008Qu-4t; Mon, 21 May 2007 15:23:31 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HqDTe-0008Qg-1d for netlmm@ietf.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 15:23:30 -0400
Received: from web84111.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.206.198]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HqDTa-0001rQ-Ji for netlmm@ietf.org; Mon, 21 May 2007 15:23:30 -0400
Received: (qmail 74313 invoked by uid 60001); 21 May 2007 19:23:26 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=qfMNCawP2tTD5Sqc62QBoNJtmhQaV0fn5fnDyON6qxQMoLgJVG0+ePRv+FB6KEGhT7j4MoNQ02aR6cyR8AkrI6fw41QDPQWVKfi1iv/pKdDqqQGfTlHDbisCUFsL3vW2jHFs+JqsK1M+Ak/KNjmYLcFdm3vPc0r2KXAbMGBBlQg=;
X-YMail-OSG: YmEHGdUVM1kruh.kYvjv7U83Ezzh0o346hHajdDotxeUhdC_lLr.sUlCpISGLMeNenNXCYieyZBBXNng4vyPHENar_ow6qcxFbWAtV2tz1VH67hEK8w-
Received: from [206.16.17.212] by web84111.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 21 May 2007 12:23:26 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/478 YahooMailWebService/0.7.41.10
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 12:23:25 -0700
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [netlmm] Is DAD needed for MN-HoA in PMIPv6
To: Bruno Mongazon-Cazavet <bruno.mongazon-cazavet@alcatel-lucent.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <103177.73542.qm@web84111.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9
Cc: netlmm <netlmm@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: netlmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
List-Id: NETLMM working group discussion list <netlmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/netlmm>
List-Post: <mailto:netlmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm>, <mailto:netlmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1460415523=="
Errors-To: netlmm-bounces@ietf.org

Bruno,
  My answer is yes, this is what we had in some of the scenarios in
draft-sarikaya-netlmm-prefix-delegation-00.txt

Regards,

--behcet

----- Original Message ----
From: Bruno Mongazon-Cazavet <bruno.mongazon-cazavet@alcatel-lucent.fr>
To: netlmm <netlmm@ietf.org>
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 11:55:55 AM
Subject: [netlmm] Is DAD needed for MN-HoA in PMIPv6

Hi all,

Just a question related to proxy mip6 draft:

If a Mobile Node is allowed/asked by a MAG to perform stateless address 
autoconf., does the mobile node needs to perform DAD procedure for the 
MN-HoA after it has received a MN-HNP and generated an interface identifier?

Thanks for your reply.
Bruno.

_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm





_______________________________________________
netlmm mailing list
netlmm@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netlmm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email