IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] Packages review - parent vs previous

"Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <jason.sterne@nokia.com> Mon, 21 October 2019 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <jason.sterne@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9263120110 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PQpHJM2MN-JD for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr30110.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.3.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B91212011B for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ofV4RPcf5Gz4XQugOCgOc0lKNyD9NbjZv+fu/DvUcRBgOlB5otfExVgRzucAIyl8EGtmD2LcvzHnaeJyWXx6YLpJt7wS/hlhWqs4yordBEYKNxt/AWOywWn41Hbui1+9cWUOSh8Ccr/FpEbTvqObMQli3r9c5lQrx/KRKZlOXPx+lcXla1pQ8iymgD9JvV1h3NW66CQN51+O4SXJdegHsepp5ano03eNScspod4DMHZMshEl61tqJmZvylyXRJ2IwziG04eMdj755OUe+5L7upLp7qE9tT7nBVFQIILMwtchL6C5xWo2JBeuFuLWGNtU+wPW9VjQPX5EXiLHFkyBuA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=vCcucoATPRYge3rgZYyTqXu/DzNO0ciQXJw0YHvUR90=; b=jNh+rOOh17PDw6Gaf2qYgaArZ96ykLKs/lv6AQ91XfAfUX2rQYnCqCUWKlyAyCMUgY97CBAoDjYSEwMLSPowYJLqjVAoYqExW+/9IjWCPicBogmg04jQOd3J8//lo8s4Fkibx0FkzDpn/SC0+L/VfdS0ggbhBoQfn2fK6Y78oY2EwygA/MhCzaM48ARhewpXwp+4qR8sfbnpxwopHF0lV39fPuugyBorAupJdH3kwC256eXeXEHXM3x+PxtEU8zPkevrjnUjqilWspW4UyrFqovxDAepRBMM2Dl4uY8c3yyF3CS0HfIZGWl+xUisEIICJNt0vc4tzC79sRI0n949Xg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nokia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nokia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nokia.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=vCcucoATPRYge3rgZYyTqXu/DzNO0ciQXJw0YHvUR90=; b=dMZezO6laxdivdJNRy36osi/x0AUG8HHT1XqQEGe4Zj11AuK97aEjwe1k/P7egVRJ2Fw94HtFh5kp+3gknZ3POoT4ANod4nBTz+18lKMWMUV+uq7KPJX1Nwry0JX29ZdATBF8JZZdssNxTpPnFoTH1rhnvoKefaecJ3NUu2bLBw=
Received: from VI1PR07MB3981.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (52.134.29.24) by VI1PR07MB4863.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (20.177.63.157) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2387.17; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:24:20 +0000
Received: from VI1PR07MB3981.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e0cf:91d4:5f3f:6fa4]) by VI1PR07MB3981.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::e0cf:91d4:5f3f:6fa4%6]) with mapi id 15.20.2387.016; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:24:20 +0000
From: "Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <jason.sterne@nokia.com>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>, "netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org" <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Packages review - parent vs previous
Thread-Index: AdWFJ0ZTblMWYKiWR6uSzLeRsjGYQADB261QAAFCueA=
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:24:19 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1PR07MB39814057C42FCB0D31D67BA49B690@VI1PR07MB3981.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <VI1PR07MB398167DB9402B420FC814B9D9B6D0@VI1PR07MB3981.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR11MB43668B3A2959D3C2C5CEB141B5690@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB43668B3A2959D3C2C5CEB141B5690@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jason.sterne@nokia.com;
x-originating-ip: [45.72.200.164]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 72671bd8-c104-45ef-cae1-08d7564b8212
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR07MB4863:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VI1PR07MB4863E3227F6126433AB70D829B690@VI1PR07MB4863.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0197AFBD92
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(366004)(396003)(199004)(189003)(51444003)(53546011)(316002)(99286004)(6506007)(76176011)(14454004)(6246003)(7696005)(110136005)(486006)(71190400001)(71200400001)(478600001)(86362001)(25786009)(2906002)(3846002)(6116002)(790700001)(476003)(186003)(102836004)(74316002)(26005)(6436002)(256004)(66066001)(9326002)(229853002)(9686003)(236005)(55016002)(2501003)(66946007)(33656002)(5660300002)(52536014)(76116006)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(66446008)(7736002)(8676002)(8936002)(11346002)(54896002)(6306002)(5024004)(81156014)(81166006)(446003)(14444005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:VI1PR07MB4863; H:VI1PR07MB3981.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: YXcw7w+WR+6wWLUoENp2AQ3eqDdJwAgf9twBa5F602cVyzFUSdIWsCvFZun5BI6jpFrILyyxEDVDHFWr0CZPlTN42IpOz5tl/PvDP79zCNYjOC5Z6ZBAQsbzWvw5agkwwsVFl+xZmt9JpiNS5yalhmUDXngp15ZpgiwJt6HxpoNgXhcCPuxhpVPcXFZgUaqlvb9R9YrNCdw7zMoKKpAee+fReMFC7AC/coiENrfmehIBLYTam33khFEnded1fpF4iXjIVf1k/KxVw4GgoqFbIRt5xYieuMs6C9Me2lw0F2nu2LvhNvySOqiwdh+/NFRd1PsJiDV820zWrNyOy8DdFf7B/DirnnTLRlJb3LfEOXa96+TycTLoownh/eL9Je40jGZ/29LrrOwysNlwJnGXg4rMV7mIRKahvO4yWvnQaQrp/JAnZR+39WbDyEJF8NWU
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_VI1PR07MB39814057C42FCB0D31D67BA49B690VI1PR07MB3981eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 72671bd8-c104-45ef-cae1-08d7564b8212
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Oct 2019 17:24:19.9481 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: WLMyHLPm5h9RExhtWO7qrMRp5MiQM/5eNR7dBi5NGsyTlRi1VcJ6uiv5b1qYOo15wvCaQiWmaLa6WLjT7VtbEg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR07MB4863
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod-ver-dt/K7-nvY0z-doRHBwL5wW53RhZxmo>
Subject: Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] Packages review - parent vs previous
X-BeenThere: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NetMod WG YANG Model Versioning Design Team <netmod-ver-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod-ver-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 17:24:27 -0000

Hi Rob,

I'm not too concerned with 'parent' vs 'previous' but intuitively I think of 'parent' as closer to the concept I have in my mind. 'previous' can start to imply some chronological aspects and also implies linear progressions. We definitely want to allow a parent to have at least 2 direct children (for branching).  I don't think we're precluding >2 either right?

But if you and others are more keen on 'previous' then I'm OK with it.

Jason

From: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2019 12:51 PM
To: Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) <jason.sterne@nokia.com>; netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Packages review - parent vs previous

Hi Jason,

I can't remember if this has been debated.  I think that parent version immediately makes me think of a tree of versions, but version lineage might also be fairly linear in many cases.

So, I'm happy to discuss this, but have a preference for 'previous-version', since it effectively just makes it a pointer (without regard to the structure).

Thanks,
Rob


From: Netmod-ver-dt <netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)
Sent: 17 October 2019 21:13
To: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
Subject: [Netmod-ver-dt] Packages review - parent vs previous

A minor thing I noticed is the use of 'previous'.

My preference is 'parent-version' rather than 'previous-version'. Was that already debated for the module versioning drafts?

Jason


From: Netmod-ver-dt <netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Sent: Monday, October 7, 2019 9:58 AM
To: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
Subject: [Netmod-ver-dt] YANG packages draft - now ready for review please

Hi,

I think that this document has had sufficient updates that it is ready for review.

The latest version is available at per the commit information above, or attached.

I appreciate that it is quite short notice, but if it is possible for folks to review and provide comments before Thursday's meeting that probably be helpful.

Thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email