Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] Possible choices for editors
"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Tue, 17 March 2020 16:49 UTC
Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C823A084F for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 09:49:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=GSJA1Y4/; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=iubO806W
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Fu_S1wb3HeR for <netmod-ver-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 09:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA3293A0849 for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 09:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=17748; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1584463779; x=1585673379; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=38GmNanEFjYsR+WJ1Ggk94maDAuqEygI6/Vq+UbhlIs=; b=GSJA1Y4/UzhUGthC5rqBAy6y064miAn7Z/u6GkIh9+cM41hTcQD4aORZ lTCeS6duaSWvnSFu3on0OmlB7MpgjVvcvyJ3lXXzhz2o3WWZApjumfLbn 7JC+m5K/aoME/GYOU4T4pLUKpomcsOsItor0SdqqkEzE5FRbcRVmowlL9 Q=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:C0NixBOWR4m3wlA/RZsl6mtXPHoupqn0MwgJ65Eul7NJdOG58o//OFDEu60/l0fHCIPc7f8My/HbtaztQyQh2d6AqzhDFf4ETBoZkYMTlg0kDtSCDBjhM//ucys8NM9DT1RiuXq8NBsdFQ==
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CLFgBT/3Be/4QNJK1mg2YvUAVsWCAECyqHWwOKdE6CEZgYglIDVAkBAQEMAQEtAgQBAYRDAoIUJDgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQUEbYVWAQuFYwEBAQEDEhsTAQEyBg8CAQgRBAEBLzIdCAEBBBMIEweDBYF9TQMuAaJZAoE5iGKCJ4J/AQEFhTsYggwJgTiMLhqBQT+BEUeCTT6ETYNBgiyOKYg/ihmPQgqCPJcTm0aPBpteAgQCBAUCDgEBBYFpIoFYcBU7gmxQGA2SEIpVdIEpjW8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,565,1574121600"; d="scan'208,217";a="734351297"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 17 Mar 2020 16:49:23 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 02HGnNdn015616 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:49:23 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:49:22 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:49:22 -0500
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:49:22 -0400
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=mSwatpsuOHNg4e4qE7ABTkSrYcPWU1UnCe5ENh4QmCCz8RTQ5p77FXdBzUCulDaK8H6G+a4qEz15Zl4wekSJ74VRDVHnZmOXyJDnqxzkMPGmS3jZYK/1SMOkGavIa8LXiTW2XSP9XiVp8NMQEz1WQD4tE8TkkAIabMMYL5v/ENpXg9zjj6gH+7bRbx2MvvRv2wyGOKPINyH4zguICfZZn+grZu+IkiZPQva8qDTnevS++IjhAS2uaxVN0kvBSpjk4evDfa2BBD1M3rVnrQ2aulnPKc23kS0phlvvCJ8p179Mt4Bb5/enGh/r2sEHDSMMvNZXXNqGaYMEUto6GpuRhQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=w9ke+jY8pMEOt/xS07nAd9PSDZKWLN8x8VuQEVy6CXI=; b=YE0ZKaokoXXM3raYbCt9pW4h1n/6apDusCEK0bh23BEa+jUGQf6/HbBeHmVbEhDBKx0//JxJLvjxrZb7DJxwQN5JIWQT4cDjjJ4SFh7LQkM53fCeEM1LDPdWAuqD+4q36x2ZzMh8kuFkB/JibOSdw5oMlNXD5rvMxR0vwEYIpF30T8/uodVnONJk/TfaCTVl7wbQ3n0z/kuVB22qPvzuFYrW/tvDwwb3dPFzyGWizf3dPvz0J86zkm7F5HKQ/wD3T627YPcqNWsaBbyM8VosyDj+G5oMWsDD1+2VLj2TotmYPxMIrNE6J9S725iFUaD6uqyZzH91HP1p+LAv+z1rsw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=w9ke+jY8pMEOt/xS07nAd9PSDZKWLN8x8VuQEVy6CXI=; b=iubO806WetOFLbo2cR1NFZme52hzRg6tCQQJDvVEsYaNWIiVoPIJaT3hFiipDDptUzWHXQkS+LdctXE9vsfA9TX5hiIObF+cRCvvH227O+MYsbXNexOAKYa3FER0DNWy1l2+w/xNnx+Ea9ubeqK18ca7B+wC1G5uLlROVdgFZcw=
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:190::17) by MN2PR11MB3856.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:ef::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2814.13; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:49:21 +0000
Received: from MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3:2164:a8e2:33b3]) by MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3:2164:a8e2:33b3%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2814.018; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:49:21 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: "netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org" <netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Possible choices for editors
Thread-Index: AdXxbZxd1OEATZUET1i9CACBsUXxdAK+KGwQ
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:49:20 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB43664CB09DF098A4284210ABB5F60@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB4366F926065E20891268E16CB5E40@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR11MB4366F926065E20891268E16CB5E40@MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=rwilton@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:c0c0:1007::321]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3afe98ce-2954-40e4-230a-08d7ca93241a
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MN2PR11MB3856:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MN2PR11MB385682C094D2B04A64E4C535B5F60@MN2PR11MB3856.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0345CFD558
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(376002)(366004)(136003)(396003)(39860400002)(199004)(66476007)(66446008)(66946007)(76116006)(66556008)(3480700007)(478600001)(64756008)(8676002)(81166006)(81156014)(55016002)(9686003)(8936002)(86362001)(71200400001)(6506007)(52536014)(7696005)(2906002)(53546011)(316002)(186003)(6916009)(33656002)(5660300002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MN2PR11MB3856; H:MN2PR11MB4366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: OOajbEE4XRegSYo8xFdfFdiNM5EwVD2a6u7gdXwH3yr5deoXO9Hb3Hg26UmKy3i9p43Irk800YQ2Ip2+imf0RNyLITgV3fBlIGG+e9jG4y4wQ7Lph7ODwGqIXv2c6vrdJfEsZaBWN0l6/CcOuO3fvlue3WxBoBzzQ8SuJktjrHkktN9t3VGYWgbcHbT/Ib1za5BYzm0ANH989ZPpTqmY1SibQuBe3KP8Gf2V5WHl4P0ctEUFa4kQYqvqOAtfEoewuQ/NkF8ga9TuhrNsfoezDjYi1iHXTd5jvBvxdKwn9bs42RINxAnyXqrP4HubsEMNokM1Al3Kvx429ba+7jqCcGjeooNCG1MZ+sMJdmYM4pt4W4A5vqTAru4NhUbrFOB5YGjK8ZV8UnYgoSi0Qxd+fatpsFxrXpYIWdv/14YA/wJgfFbzaMSb2rlClTxb9UEC
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: xD1IY6exlVBwQvsto1PjIJlYgktNTkppJEi/3MszTvSvjzDbzem1M4WJyJhET4hrrp7+O/Wvb3kCTje5Wv35MJtNQWsOcnSTdmc0G9AB1uAR8DvL4QzFFr9BF5vwURpSzYYvjCA9HiQ14UKR2r5k7nHcAPVUbRlSAPwwsxAEuE0=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR11MB43664CB09DF098A4284210ABB5F60MN2PR11MB4366namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3afe98ce-2954-40e4-230a-08d7ca93241a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 17 Mar 2020 16:49:20.8931 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: how+4E8cZuFGL/+dxCKVi92PJP99BKk6NwKim8LkrAO8pNfK1SRTIWTj6LvB0WVbdXH20LqvKue0UysNSiJsxQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MN2PR11MB3856
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-10.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod-ver-dt/nhvg6izzTb_zAibdrHgaXh1ojiM>
Subject: Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] Possible choices for editors
X-BeenThere: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NetMod WG YANG Model Versioning Design Team <netmod-ver-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod-ver-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod-ver-dt>, <mailto:netmod-ver-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:49:42 -0000
Notes from today's DT meeting. Bo, Joe, Reshad, Rob attended We plan on keeping the 107 meeting slides format to broadly be the same, but raising more issues. + Joe to publish the ietf- version of the drafts. + RobW to ask about what we should do with the Reqs draft. * Take to WGLC? * Publish as informational? + RobW to raise with NETMOD/NETCONF chairs on the best way forward for progressing these drafts. See further notes inline below. From: Netmod-ver-dt <netmod-ver-dt-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Rob Wilton (rwilton) Sent: 03 March 2020 15:10 To: netmod-ver-dt@ietf.org Subject: [Netmod-ver-dt] Possible choices for editors Obviously conditional on input from WG chairs & adoption results. >From discussion today: 6) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-schema-comparison-00 - Reshad? - Schema comparison tooling, unchanged from the version presented at 106. [RW] * Keep this discussion fairly short. 5) draft-wilton-netmod-yang-ver-selection-02 - Joe/Jason? - Version selection, updated since 106, as per notes below [RW] Issues: * Move to NETCONF WG? * Does it need to be split due to updating both NETCONF and RESTCONF? 4) draft-rwilton-netmod-yang-packages-03 - Bo? - YANG packages draft, updated since 106 [RW] Bo producing slides Discussed proposed issues to raise from the github issues list. 2) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-module-versioning-01 - Balazs? - Base module versioning solution, unchanged from the version presented at 106. [RW] * Feedback from Martin. * Reshad to produce slides for 107. 3) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-semver-01 - Joe/Jason? - YANG Semantic version numbers, unchanged from the version presented at 106. [RW] - Do we mandate IETF drafts use YANG Semver? - Joe's going to produce slides. 1) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-solutions-03 - Rob? - Solution overview, updated since 106 to cover updates to version selection and schema comparison drafts. [RW] * Not planning to say much on this at all, at this stage. 0) requirements draft - Joe - Already adopted.
- [Netmod-ver-dt] Possible choices for editors Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [Netmod-ver-dt] Possible choices for editors Rob Wilton (rwilton)