[netmod] Re: Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-acl-extensions-15: (with COMMENT)

[Mike Bishop <[e-mail]>]

Looks good -- thanks!
________________________________
From: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2025 5:33 AM
To: Mike Bishop <[e-mail]>; The IESG <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-acl-extensions-15: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mike,

Thanks for the comment.

Please see inline.

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Mike Bishop via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
> Envoyé : mercredi 26 mars 2025 21:02
> À : The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc : [e-mail]; netmod-
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Objet : Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-acl-
> extensions-15: (with COMMENT)
>
>
> Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-netmod-acl-extensions-15: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut
> this introductory paragraph, however.)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> In 3.2, I found this statement to be confusing, perhaps because of my
> limited
> familiarity with YANG: "The port numbers can be individual port
> numbers, a
> range of port numbers, and an operation." At the least, I would have
> expected
> "or", and I didn't know what "an operation" would represent in the
> context of
> port numbers.
>

[Med] Fair. Updated the text as follows:

NEW:
 A port number can be a port range or a single port number along with
 an operator (equal to, greater than or equal to, etc.).

The diff rendering can be seen here as well:

https://author-tools.ietf.org/api/iddiff?url_1=https://netmod-wg.github.io/enhanced-acl-netmod/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-extensions.txt&url_2=https://netmod-wg.github.io/enhanced-acl-netmod/mike-iesg-comment/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-extensions.txt


> This seems to be referencing RFC 8519's `port-range-or-operator`
> grouping,
> which allows for a single port number, a range of port numbers, or a
> combination of a single port number with an operator (which in turn
> can be
> `eq`, `neq`, `lte`, or `gte`). Clearer wording and an explicit
> reference might
> be helpful here, though I assume the intended audience is already
> familiar with
> YANG conventions.
>
>

____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.