[netmod] Re: Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Reshad Rahman <[e-mail]>]

 Hi Roman,
We have addressed the issue you pointed out below.
Regards,Reshad (on behalf of the authors).
A new version of Internet-Draft
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-17.txt has been successfully
submitted by Reshad Rahman and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:    draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning
Revision: 17
Title:    Updated YANG Module Revision Handling
Date:    2026-06-29
Group:    netmod
Pages:    40
URL:      https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-17.txt
Status:   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning/
HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning
Diff:     https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-17
    On Wednesday, June 3, 2026 at 02:58:38 PM EDT, Reshad Rahman <reshad=[e-mail]> wrote:  
 
  Thank you Roman. We got similar feedback from Med and we will address it in the next revision.
Regards,Reshad.
    On Wednesday, June 3, 2026 at 02:38:57 PM EDT, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:  
 
 Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-16: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

** Section 9.2
  In all cases, IANA MUST follow the versioning guidance specified in
  Section 3.1, and MUST include a "rev:non-backwards-compatible"
  substatement to the latest revision statement whenever an IANA
  maintained module is updated in a non-backwards-compatible way, as
  described in Section 3.2.

Please do not use BCP14 keywords in IANA considerations text.  See
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-statement-on-clarifying-the-use-of-bcp-14-key-words/


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to Joel Halpern for the GENART review.



  _______________________________________________
netmod mailing list -- [e-mail]
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]