Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Fri, 09 March 2018 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF98112D77A; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 06:22:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5JZ3enSeVBww; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 06:22:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 005F512778E; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 06:22:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=717; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1520605349; x=1521814949; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LUQtCPFHdqDYT7KrpknIOJddNFCiTRQV73f69pmpwRo=; b=ZFdJmVvov+7+Gm7u4ARfx52kvuPiVtXaJx2qa/6E3IWetd9lAlNK9lfe OBSdF0vwlrw2AgWTDzJqJEHuLQ5pH8rO5lFvDk+q8g/4j/wYcrTdSeTSZ ZRldsFNtd4mdb492YLUy2UGkbjvgxPMT+b/O2xjZbf8sUlGmAb8qKqp8q w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ByAQCFl6Ja/xbLJq1eGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQcBAQEBAYUlg3iLEY8GgRaWPwqFJQKDMjcVAQIBAQEBAQECayeFJAEFIxV?= =?us-ascii?q?RCxgCAiYCAlcGAQwIAQGFFa0JgiaEDAFkg3WCGoEOhCiEBIIPgwSIKoJiBJpVC?= =?us-ascii?q?ZBiB4kKhVeLRYYCgSw0IoFSMxoIGxWCfoJigS4BNz+LQwEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.47,445,1515456000"; d="scan'208";a="2522800"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Mar 2018 14:22:27 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w29EMQgR015823; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 14:22:27 GMT
To: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis@ietf.org
References: <152050158005.21412.3389388204390015375.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CABCOCHSmCioJPNM5b9J-5WCsXe_J2jMzKKCD8fw02uh-D5nNdA@mail.gmail.com> <e627d122-a709-c41c-b58a-b5890b8d2103@nostrum.com> <CABCOCHSLAKZCyACHgQvdqU6TLLdLBtY9izh7+2Pi4Qc3Z2-Sjw@mail.gmail.com> <20180309062933.oeitoohvvowfjh2b@elstar.local>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <1ca7deec-3dbd-cbed-d70b-ce043a1714ee@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 15:22:26 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180309062933.oeitoohvvowfjh2b@elstar.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/2PDIlfoPWM4VhXmcj_vZfT-bIZ4>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-18: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 14:22:31 -0000

Hi,
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:08:32PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
>> I don't really know what a guideline should say about patterns.
>> I will try to add something that says to document the pattern limitations
>> and keep the pattern as simple as possible,
>>
> I object to a statement that "pattern should be as simple as
> possible".
The only guideline that makes sense is: "the pattern must be correct" or 
"the pattern must be meaningful". Not even worth mentioning, as this is 
so obvious!
Whether it's a simple or a complex regex is orthogonal here: the pattern 
must fulfill its job.

Adam, if you still believe something is missing, can you suggest some text.

Regards, Benoit
>
> /js
>