[netmod] xpath for must statements
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Tue, 07 August 2018 22:00 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4ABD131100 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:00:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mAq_rdUhJUlF for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13CF0130DC3 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 15:00:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3308; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1533679226; x=1534888826; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=HRyPJtRCdOXCdDhb2mMXIbeo11iybudDeK5epnpxDX8=; b=JeZsvKjr3voNK8/n1c5q5b/OSU4iCxCuHQf6+ctVmZ19hNdXW5HbGD/Q qPbcamITx7CGkaihvGakynK9UD4G0zGG0nNiDtldcT1C0emTRBLNeGy+3 pIYkEYBcFhmIlXOriZ1j8qQJuTJaC7rD8vVvBLSTP9e8UPxBHCgSbI9TR M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DHBABQFWpb/5FdJa1cHAEBAQQBAQoBAYJXd2N/MoN0lFGSXIcYC4UFgywhOBQBAgEBAgEBAm0dC4VhaAEMPgIEMB8IBIMzAYEbZKw5gS6EYIVviQ8XggCBOR+KSzGCJAKaOQkCj0WOJ5I9AhEUgSQ0IYFScBVlAYI/kFKONoEbAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.51,456,1526342400"; d="scan'208,217";a="434851343"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Aug 2018 22:00:25 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (xch-rtp-011.cisco.com [64.101.220.151]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w77M0OE0007031 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 22:00:25 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-011.cisco.com (64.101.220.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:00:24 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Tue, 7 Aug 2018 18:00:24 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: xpath for must statements
Thread-Index: AQHULpoKt9x7V9xDM0K8KDBrtthF9Q==
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 22:00:24 +0000
Message-ID: <3FBE6E06-3C42-4CFE-9A4C-FAC55572901C@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.201]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_3FBE6E063C424CFE9A4CFAC55572901Cciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 64.101.220.151, xch-rtp-011.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/3QqTNSGMzacRS_hodlZkkdKhy4M>
Subject: [netmod] xpath for must statements
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2018 22:00:32 -0000
Is it possible to indicate that choice statement must be specified in a YANG 1.1 “must” clause w/o specifying every case? Similarly, it is there a way specify that a container cannot be empty in “must” clause? Thanks, Acee
- [netmod] xpath for must statements Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] xpath for must statements Ivory, William
- Re: [netmod] xpath for must statements Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] xpath for must statements Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] xpath for must statements Ivory, William
- Re: [netmod] xpath for must statements Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] xpath for must statements Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [netmod] xpath for must statements Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] xpath for must statements Acee Lindem (acee)