[netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7317 (6245)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 29 July 2020 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124BD3A0B64 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fFeu7zTReh5S for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:32:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40E8B3A0B5D for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 95FD6F4071F; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
To: andy@yumaworks.com, mbj@tail-f.com, warren@kumari.net, rwilton@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, kent+ietf@watsen.net, lberger@labn.net
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: maurizio.brigandi@sm-optics.com, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200729133225.95FD6F4071F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 06:32:25 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/57h4gH75xZye97vqZpss0k5wlN4>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 06 Aug 2020 08:10:53 -0700
Subject: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7317 (6245)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 13:33:05 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7317,
"A YANG Data Model for System Management".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6245

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Maurizio Brigandi' <maurizio.brigandi@sm-optics.com>

Section: 6

Original Text
-------------

         leaf-list user-authentication-order {
           type identityref {
             base authentication-method;
           }
           must '(. != "sys:radius" or ../../radius/server)' 



Corrected Text
--------------

         leaf-list user-authentication-order {
           type identityref {
             base authentication-method;
           }
           must '(not(. = "sys:radius") or ../../radius/server)'
 

Notes
-----
As indicated in https://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xpath-19991116/#booleans

the following expression comparing a node-set with a string

       . != "sys:radius"

is true if at least one node in the node-set satisfies the boolean expression.

This is not the intention of the "must" condition.

It is necessary to use not(. = "sys:radius") to achieve the right intention of the check.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC7317 (draft-ietf-netmod-system-mgmt-16)
--------------------------------------
Title               : A YANG Data Model for System Management
Publication Date    : August 2014
Author(s)           : A. Bierman, M. Bjorklund
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network Modeling
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG