Re: [netmod] why is the alarm YANG work being done in CCAMP?
stefan vallin <stefan@wallan.se> Thu, 20 July 2017 06:53 UTC
Return-Path: <stefan@wallan.se>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B5A131907 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 23:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=wallan-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JvqKweiqcWe6 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 23:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x231.google.com (mail-lf0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE7D8127866 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 23:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x231.google.com with SMTP id g25so4573559lfh.1 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 23:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wallan-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=7froCfcHU8Mm3NpB/5oeogV+seadS7nd7L2dHTx+Vcs=; b=cGTzm8KS40iEaDV/TvOYwi5CKMqoHngnk9WllG1zjRwiOPjFA0cZWVMge6dp0gsUbb ouZM/Zo+gPKApDnT/3whkXSuvRp96hZ75Urtqor+qsbIVjoBAVN7nV3N/Z0/X5nxSIDG RXCUlhZ/Pmm1sUm5lxjP725yWBjUuc775hystAFSs0zzWR2T2gi3N+PD7AC3NG5U1ptS l/67EVT6YdLE5DzCThH7YQciJxcDn+umIWlBsOAFLxjvugb03euw1SUB+gHGEoRNE4iY LitoRQEHbtAl7prbK2j4CKYETaQIXSrHcCPF2Z+RrvQXbEbIqhrb/M2taJ1Pv2iZwnmB CJ/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=7froCfcHU8Mm3NpB/5oeogV+seadS7nd7L2dHTx+Vcs=; b=GUhJ/ApWoFp7sRiJSptzLBHrpe+WWMyNJUsMTMpcKEASq5ZsYenRX5Nsajp2M0d0xK 94eqauA5XY/GFkJPiq+AmIR7bLRhqt+uhNVGXVZmMIlAORx6PccQbNPrlwE6qEBBerXT RxE8XoG+rQlojehtqMNVKQXJwTJXIsh/NSGmlOQheSLEYj4D2M0WmEcf5LvSes+HYxb2 b1FVjY9KW5snX+anM+QJMmV/joOfhYNPFaA2x2YgNTUwLAK//KfHfitfr8bY4ClbhcAu g6p6t/ItN0dcRnJOCUmmNsUT0NdEIUuKfKsfNJYmnnaH+7JlPY5CxOISxPthlB0PAf7c 1SWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113gqhqVmF3N98DUInCEp0oeOOos/JALGedN6U9TVMX4/n0IlRUb wLPurqX+nILf0mdM
X-Received: by 10.25.229.82 with SMTP id c79mr863468lfh.251.1500533617924; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 23:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.99.164] ([195.234.15.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v13sm312293ljd.17.2017.07.19.23.53.36 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 19 Jul 2017 23:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5C3AE25F-B2B3-45B5-8BA3-60EFE3D7426C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: stefan vallin <stefan@wallan.se>
In-Reply-To: <CAFgnS4UGyAhGr34JR3ys_4dxwN=5WxnyR4dvUjz4JT5CSSeptA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:53:35 +0200
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Message-Id: <F639733F-8828-4B8F-9752-F955770842A9@wallan.se>
References: <CAFgnS4UGyAhGr34JR3ys_4dxwN=5WxnyR4dvUjz4JT5CSSeptA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/5KPt3-2WlYTeJEhD_0PEKaxXq8U>
Subject: Re: [netmod] why is the alarm YANG work being done in CCAMP?
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 06:53:42 -0000
Hi Dan! Agree, there is a long thread on this and I voted on NETMOD all along Stefan Vallin stefan@wallan.se +46705233262 > On 17 Jul 2017, at 16:16, Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am sorry if I am late to observing this. Please feel free to bash me and point to where this discussion already took place. I just heard in the NETMOD WG meeting that draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module is going to be undertaken by the CCAMP WG. What is the reason? The problem space of Alarm management data model seems IMO pretty generic, and on the other side I cannot see what is CCAMP-ish or even RTG Area specific in this work. > > Thanks and Regards, > > Dan > (one of the authors of RFC 3877) > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
- [netmod] why is the alarm YANG work being done in… Dan Romascanu
- Re: [netmod] why is the alarm YANG work being don… stefan vallin
- Re: [netmod] why is the alarm YANG work being don… Kristian Larsson