Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 31 August 2020 11:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC5F3A1268; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 04:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id msSpOY_NRwaP; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 04:39:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F11163A0744; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 04:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml739-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 20CE5F5428082C629F66; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 12:39:24 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml750-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.200) by lhreml739-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.189) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 12:39:23 +0100
Received: from lhreml750-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.200) by lhreml750-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.200) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 12:39:23 +0100
Received: from DGGEML421-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.38) by lhreml750-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.200) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 12:39:23 +0100
Received: from DGGEML531-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.229]) by dggeml421-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.38]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:39:13 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
CC: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags@ietf.org" <draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags
Thread-Index: AdZ/iElLKiKP5m2WRQ6h/ElmHyFLdw==
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:39:13 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAAD976512@dggeml531-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.101.103]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/8YcQ2875fHU5GvfTBMvZufG0eac>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 11:39:28 -0000

Good, thanks Jurgen for clarification.

-Qin
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de] 
发送时间: 2020年8月30日 18:52
收件人: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
抄送: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>et>; Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>et>; netmod@ietf.org; draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags@ietf.org
主题: Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags

On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 10:40:36AM +0000, Qin Wu wrote:
> 
> Wrong. The semantics of the counter types provided by ietf-yang-types are well defined.
> 
> [Qin]: I agree counter types in ietf-yang-types are well defined. 
> If counter types can help distinguish avg value from min, max, sum 
> value, current value, I am happy to adopt it, however I fail to see 
> ietf-yang-types can do that and I don't think distinguishing avg from min,max etc is the job of ietf-yang-types. It add complexity if going with that direction, in my understanding.

You miss my point: The specification of a leaf needs to be clear what it is. If it is not clear, then the specification is buggy.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>