IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netmod] module-versioning should require any solution to describe labels for drafts

"Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <jason.sterne@nokia.com> Mon, 22 June 2020 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <jason.sterne@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458403A0D61 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kCrkw0McaBdB for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:24:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM10-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-mw2nam10on2105.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.94.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E703C3A0D93 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YzcGlpoE9wuxZ6ytaBBMQ/3GRo1W3k/LBv/QRchHBQINdu0Umm9ys7FDsGEelPvJdTRmmgsU1y2e4vM43PG1asSJ+9Dc8/xQS5kZPaJp56HFYEW4IjAvtr9n18dz4G2hK5sC4wa/Ecje6gQdg6aanpKQinVyydRWSS6QQfdwo8k26AT2t3MJsiGOLL5NECQRTxdebJVcPY2fgGCqKbiShEh+ejFf64HkNtd0R5MbFlyZPLQx6SJWpzBE9HuBaHMIUnxwxCcAYBD4Xdf33cOLE/s1c9YXFFYe/3giE/5i7NFwM4ie9IXDiJMGZfqwn9FVApLQCvyVwCs6sAPaTLgrrg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=k8sYwlTQ9AGnbURGVMEVC+pvK1LEXciBqlDPvFe/gJY=; b=l1Cux71Rt/AqwvnKHCgs5N7V1LrJu+IbzytIiqRy1Z/i3348VdBYGhZn0rOVjAdP8r5KwjZjnCFBmMeePzi3UgRXVPB/E9/Ofph0e+r0SNI1fSto5nLKfak/95PTr4AfjKBkk6AULz1JjBmk6koJ0aaDBbZuzUkjUHApmH3FLzwTNE+mvGuVTOEVFIZ8k8kiESri9pht6698VbtXIYlfTZDsxDQn0IA4+olf6tfFv98Jw04BMAnaziJNck0+gKKNJSFxyHEkMfbUCxeMhEA+YSZKTQ7EEX1lXgDCmfFhdtG38AmKkEVRAgX4uRWrdXPIXnfblNnmASOAVLw1C3dnoA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nokia.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nokia.com; dkim=pass header.d=nokia.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=k8sYwlTQ9AGnbURGVMEVC+pvK1LEXciBqlDPvFe/gJY=; b=AKDNLTUTnDd08d6rbECE1xF8HjueHI0LI0tp6oVCVMF6jymdqPPL7caW+H6N8wRtv7BxH0XMue8WtDKgm+E9LLdM45+HMNIpebQ9Uk/3+hFf3n7v3yGZQdtjSPCHlJ8nB6Q9Wflhg5qt28zpiPAr52UTTHbMFWjOO3OEOjDQDF0=
Received: from DM5PR08MB2633.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:ca::21) by DM5PR08MB2409.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:3:71::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3109.21; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:24:33 +0000
Received: from DM5PR08MB2633.namprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b02f:de62:22d1:444f]) by DM5PR08MB2633.namprd08.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b02f:de62:22d1:444f%8]) with mapi id 15.20.3109.027; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:24:33 +0000
From: "Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <jason.sterne@nokia.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: module-versioning should require any solution to describe labels for drafts
Thread-Index: AdZIqTodlifsCupDS9O8VkBxipyRrQ==
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:24:33 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR08MB2633618B426287D32C6D5D219B970@DM5PR08MB2633.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=nokia.com;
x-originating-ip: [24.226.236.156]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 6b9e55b1-d0c6-4916-6a62-08d816c05d96
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR08MB2409:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR08MB2409EF05DC124EDE4D1543DE9B970@DM5PR08MB2409.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7691;
x-forefront-prvs: 0442E569BC
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: c7eR4q4g3CUH+nzyWeEuoSaC3ynbSs57kivwlaNspGsx2sZ5NBgjsVgT9bcClhCcFywow6HdNAsG38e1QHBi/lSqA1RFcJFooXNQe8Jx5DjGQuqHDtQqrobzR9wnd2acPswHzHry4Rx6bMMFrqQSCyZY74zvsCzKfBqgR+VUrEA6GyajoGdagdp5QntzONAyJTFwXnXENKZP3Gf3zga8lWnkt1l8UGnzUiDZmTW80H1H9Zu/79G9u4r2ifvw9oCewUmWDBhvuZdwiQvPt+ARtXQm8qGbOOLmHQ2gvYk4OopYVTMUMFQXSSJLyIGF6Okfdqs/7rsQmdeB2EYqdnwhOn2uV9qy/ZrinqBUFVxJu/cSeBOOJAdla5OLzjq7vfnNKwPDXITZlTcd/44zsE/Mfg==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM5PR08MB2633.namprd08.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(366004)(376002)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(346002)(9686003)(316002)(66946007)(76116006)(6506007)(83380400001)(26005)(8676002)(6916009)(86362001)(8936002)(478600001)(966005)(5660300002)(7696005)(186003)(66476007)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(52536014)(166002)(55016002)(33656002)(71200400001)(4744005)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM5PR08MB2633618B426287D32C6D5D219B970DM5PR08MB2633namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 6b9e55b1-d0c6-4916-6a62-08d816c05d96
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Jun 2020 15:24:33.1386 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: VVkkHOkpiJCS5bvUpDZfGCeEn5LBYWqUwAUbosNLwIlYa+siWNvKrqOavFAawjKJ0Oih+t1x8V1AOt7ngxciWA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR08MB2409
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/RX35db6-lH1uuynMT2Ih3mmrkhc>
Subject: [netmod] module-versioning should require any solution to describe labels for drafts
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:24:38 -0000

Hi guys,

In the latest working copy of the YANG Semver draft we added some text in section 5 about how to select revision labels for modules that are under development, or for RFCs that are churning (i.e. bis versions).

https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt/blob/master/yang-semver/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver.txt

I think we probably need to require that same information for any revision label scheme. I'd suggest we put something along these lines into the module-versioning draft:

Any revision label scheme MUST describe how labels are selected for new YANG modules that are under development, and how labels are selected for modules in IETF RFCs that are being updated (e.g. a "bis" version is under development).

(should we drop the "in IETF RFCs" ? )

Jason

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email