IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netmod] IANA Considerations

tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Thu, 16 August 2018 11:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CB6130F17 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 04:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.187
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RATWARE_MS_HASH=2.148, RATWARE_OUTLOOK_NONAME=2.95, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G4AuG3OHPvau for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 04:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR02-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr10113.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.1.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1649B130F1C for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 04:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btconnect.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-btconnect-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=p9uVqqqvSwpKpfmCzqbGs7dKRhWCgyaJfa0hu5Cr1Os=; b=X3wpxkDUwr2CiODp23KYM/VprbWCXhDlt3x7u/PQlafFkNjK4AHzpito3K7DZeDag+O/wvNQCJrpLLfEnonu877caO37IpAHPvg6eiIEt6qb2gWS1Eqc/f0NOCY5YX1AD77IoTm55uwX0Ym3QO6iiACH7C8vKU4tMBI0tEPwA58=
Received: from VI1PR07MB0831.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.161.107.154) by VI1PR07MB3486.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.175.244.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1059.10; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 11:51:39 +0000
Received: from VI1PR07MB0831.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::715f:f4a2:caef:d939]) by VI1PR07MB0831.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::715f:f4a2:caef:d939%2]) with mapi id 15.20.1059.017; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 11:51:39 +0000
From: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IANA Considerations
Thread-Index: AQHUNVd9D5dW4VfrAUyctAMpV7x6GQ==
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 11:51:39 +0000
Message-ID: <07ba01d43557$064ca460$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <98a58631-0c57-7ed8-5277-5dcb3ee9dd86@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: VI1PR0601CA0030.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:800:1e::40) To VI1PR07MB0831.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:508e::26)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [86.165.128.211]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; VI1PR07MB3486; 6:7cRox+S8DqrH2QcJ4un9saEsj7yZXq+zr5kvs5OPAFrYlNq3WlofngGz+gKs2geqPgX3DUZcS2P0CcQ7Xp7J1ygBEinTVwifxAxDaQ3sVhwWzyBXxqJFyy1Ks3Qma83jHlcSgWdDg7h7rwLjzDf/sniaYzFr0gTn4spgBRiQuLMKu0iK2Z7FDA2iie5X4tSRIsR7FoNVvEMVmbLFKZpUuijUQavHEQZMzZsP0JQ2kMmwd73qUKbe/T/xpABhQro4023bT/vaha6Z9/zG0z7zyjeDcfyVN+QJszTU2CSRQGHdzKR6hgPz/e/O3lxbbBW+kw/dzYArf8wwS+XOywS3/bI/CVCQKQL5BpdUq6TICdtFU3J0cvMjsrQNVbCokFMPeoehAxPqjgRXMidyWuJ0lKHuoiw2tekkCf+XcdiOSduPDW+ZkNOP54P4HE12cX1Wm/M3sPAFOS6otnxU0JggCg==; 5:qSkZjGEzv3DE2qS3PBKrF+i6r/glWyZoG3xPp0CW+GNGQFQKLjDaSjVP9oKDw8ybYtv+Il1AVaNgNuJagK4LE8Vw+B2LP+W3uv26lleUnwh73k4qDLle+hbSu5WnKARdKJQeBN50Q746dGxiKU4+9aesvSlQTM+XnNHhtksSJ9I=; 7:6oXlyebYzBxHLJmAZeJBTduyUE73K21iZWWSYZvgHDDX440ADSXDYLcgFQgcrq4zhuGMUL4udcUd8GpwnjKK/1BBj0EIcX6cB6BGHT6yUkgAClNq6WmFI63SoBH69b40OB8ht9oKjO0COR6Q1x1ijbI9TlYytf0VuPHzzGGyf4+v+SsnPk3UD5ps835Br0MBh38WgJbxOg1JuaDzdS/ruCnxnipT/DzukR1iaEaWVuj33JCn0qFxRX4iNn7pb/4v
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 5be834d7-7d02-47a4-5376-08d6036e9fbe
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652040)(8989137)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990107)(5600074)(711020)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:VI1PR07MB3486;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR07MB3486:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ietfc@btconnect.com;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VI1PR07MB3486D1B70650CDB0EAC4A97CA03E0@VI1PR07MB3486.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3231311)(944501410)(52105095)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(20161123562045)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:VI1PR07MB3486; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:VI1PR07MB3486;
x-forefront-prvs: 07665BE9D1
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(366004)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(189003)(199004)(81166006)(26005)(81156014)(7736002)(305945005)(2501003)(99286004)(106356001)(105586002)(5250100002)(2906002)(1730700003)(7116003)(5660300001)(2351001)(476003)(316002)(8936002)(486006)(25786009)(84392002)(8676002)(6512007)(9686003)(66066001)(33896004)(14454004)(1556002)(221733001)(446003)(44736005)(6436002)(76176011)(52116002)(478600001)(3480700004)(6486002)(68736007)(256004)(86152003)(6506007)(6916009)(14496001)(2900100001)(186003)(386003)(86362001)(53936002)(3846002)(97736004)(6116002)(102836004)(5640700003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:VI1PR07MB3486; H:VI1PR07MB0831.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:0;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: btconnect.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: /Zkyf6GyI9nYKImhU95bCIjvdvx7pKiOQDm+OOUW3AQ+D/4wzbzOL4lBkO7wlOgIARuUe068jTplqH4/3lFPQsdb75qbKKK1DP1rjrfNGuClMgKga5cDL+Ce/3dco+mG6tYIl4SbJh4x/6sVvOKcazV86RXBPPuQLO7PTH4pk6FwWYUMJhJDvfCfR3r6JKg6uEX+u/uRpBO40RIha37rMbFILGEStrS4h6QRq4IBLAFynNjs58OUug9Nifiltqmn8Da8946Na6qI64fp1K+88CZvExrwxEEFaLXK3xMxe3jRSEPRDF2f+Q1NWI9kyvQnZq6hxA6qs9r55YbX5AcUoA==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <F422908DF6E58B4FBDE79CE99B41570D@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 5be834d7-7d02-47a4-5376-08d6036e9fbe
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Aug 2018 11:51:39.1658 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: cf8853ed-96e5-465b-9185-806bfe185e30
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR07MB3486
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/9BSn0e34eFoDvUqKHXlMkE_1Id0>
Subject: [netmod] IANA Considerations
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 11:51:44 -0000

I see that some recent YANG module I-Ds reference RFC6020 for
registering a YANG module name, others reference RFC7950, and did some
homework before suggesting that one or the other needed changing.

The IANA website refers the user to

RFC 6020, Internet Draft draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-20

draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-20
points the user to RFC6020 and seems to add nothing to that.

RFC7950 points the user to RFC6020 and seems to add nothing to that.  In
fact, the IANA Considerations section of RFC7950, unlike that of
RFC6020, is not helpful on this point - the relevant section is 6.3.

I conclude that the better reference is RFC6020 (and that the IANA
website might be clearer just referring to that).

Tom Petch

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email