Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-08.txt

[Robert Wilton <[e-mail]>]

On 21/12/2017 07:36, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 07:53:37PM -0800, Andy Bierman wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 2:23 AM, Martin Bjorklund <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This version addresses the WGLC comments from Andy and Lou, as
>>> discussed on the list.
>>>
>>>
>> I have reviewed draft-08.
>>
>> The behavior and server capability reporting for the RFC 6241 datastores
>> should
>> remain the authoritative conformance mechanism for conventional datastores.
>> The server YANG library and <hello> advertisement MUST reflect the same
>> server metadata (for the relevant standard capabilities).
This statement seems reasonable, but would probably be better placed in 
the NETCONF NMDA protocol draft?

>>
>> Sec. 5.1 needs to be clear that the existing :candidate, :writable-running,
>> and :startup
>> capabilities still apply, if advertised by the server. Not sure what text
>> to add.
> There are a lot of things that are not changed at all - does it make
> sense to cherry pick some of them and say that they did not change?
> It seems that technically there is no point in doing this.
I'm also not sure whether this needs stating.  Isn't the assumption that 
everything still applies unless explicitly stated to the contrary?

But if we need to add any text then I think that any such text would be 
more appropriate in the NMDA protocol drafts rather than the base NMDA 
architecture specification.

Thanks,
Rob


>
> /js
>