Re: [netmod] [Netconf] PANIC Bar BoF Wednesday @ 6:30pm CDT

Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> Thu, 30 March 2017 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDC9129583; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B7MuL1UCXfPV; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22d.google.com (mail-pg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60722129483; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id g2so49777515pge.3; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=d7n0OsvI/E7+Yq5EncNM9IcshiVZcXglle39gzrq8Dc=; b=ih8nvURFKBQYdAAxqj3PCbkKDGGUS1bUlcMZMvwAAyBvP1fG38yLaZn79WUrK3U+HM Anoq9z+WGsfkWUoodyGhb/GbsF9+iRSMwPK4OvVq0Hx20Ro2KmxK5Wgwkh5AfEvKMa8R E7Sml4iBo6oVeEQGJ7YYLD3kY8yQOoJgSXaEcJ8SjGACxId1GoPpfJjgp30kd8li5FU8 A79ORrCsbHXkFCCQl2brQfUWPO6DTO04TJ1LCxIcghZO1bAY0hYx/7DvjibAEtGryjEQ 2Q3/fC6BWTTCVebtBixpsYxYu006keBevnABnk3L9YY1wMIV14cTXCQNCVaHS7Ie5t0v KWFA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=d7n0OsvI/E7+Yq5EncNM9IcshiVZcXglle39gzrq8Dc=; b=n+62Z6GQQGvBUky4ktktzai45icgI+TN/HFngZMkhFbHOsiumoQyWUFZwGzhAaH95f bezxVHU4g0j1A/tdkVQmNMvvwB0UE0jCHYddCWUpRWbtQtrrbDWGtvhYsFNfJl5DRJEq i/6b73/S3EMQExTXobywjdcB7JxD5oPU8Mpd7GBR6tqOY+gt7zt7CrtquN7o9WRvmmzd 2Yx7NK/qKUjg8JwS/tVk3Ox8YlVDg6kV22eGbe6/sE/2Pyz/PZYjapM0t4pIxONczuBy 8WMVJZvHMd/QuwKQT+jacuOzabfKd9fjGZ45/uJflnkyekotX2mXpFLL7P7SeU3vYPv/ hdeA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1FThdrfqT9Yk+sPekffJkWhKQQ9ykryI8h8495srZHvSZPFu2vOuSuX6biZUxX2g==
X-Received: by 10.84.149.168 with SMTP id m37mr1342822pla.97.1490908171684; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:c0c8:1006::483? ([2001:420:c0c8:1006::483]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b80sm6178658pfe.87.2017.03.30.14.09.30 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR09MB1440B3D5C3C983216D0BCB74F0300@MWHPR09MB1440.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:09:28 -0500
Cc: "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "sacm@ietf.org" <sacm@ietf.org>, "mile@ietf.org" <mile@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <19D82D4B-0810-47EF-93CE-92539D64358D@gmail.com>
References: <MWHPR09MB1440B3D5C3C983216D0BCB74F0300@MWHPR09MB1440.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/9l5oXcZ2sWpMdD5weRZwav1nqSM>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Netconf] PANIC Bar BoF Wednesday @ 6:30pm CDT
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 21:10:25 -0000

David,

> On Mar 26, 2017, at 5:34 PM, Waltermire, David A. (Fed) <david.waltermire@nist.gov> wrote:
> 
> 
> The US Government has been working within the IETF SACM work group to standardize the collection of endpoint configuration and other posture information from enterprise endpoints. Collecting this information is critical to support automation of common network security tasks, including asset, software, vulnerability, and configuration management. Thus far, our efforts have focused primarily on standards to collect information in support of asset, software and vulnerability management use cases, and has worked with other IETF members to determine what data would need to be to be collected, and how that data would be securely communicated across the network. Through such exchanges an organization can know what client endpoints are connected to their network, and if they are vulnerable to attack.
> 
> Given the proliferation of attacks against network infrastructure devices, it is clear that the next step in our enterprise security automation effort must be to enable standardized reporting of similar information from network infrastructure devices. With the growing number of Yang models and increased adoption of NETCONF, RESTCONF, and related protocol work, the time is right to work out how these standards can be used to measure the health of network devices. This information will, as in our efforts in SACM for client devices, support asset, software, vulnerability, and configuration management use cases. Standards-based reporting of this information from network infrastructure devices will help network defenders protect against known attacks, and provide the necessary knowledge to detect and mitigate future attacks. 
> 
> We would like to start a discussion about how to leverage the existing IETF network management protocols to best address security automation for network infrastructure devices. We would like your ideas on how to best pursue this work, and your insights into network infrastructure security problems that will impact our networks in the future. We are holding a side meeting at IETF 98 on Wednesday, March 29th at 6:30pm CDT to start a discussion about how to move forward. We will be meeting in Vevey 4 at the IETF meeting venue.

Maybe this was discussed in the BoF …

The best way to have a discussion would be to present the proposal in the form of a draft in the NETCONF WG.

> 
> Here is a summary of the meeting details:
> 
> PANIC (Posture Assessment through Network Information Collection) Bar BoF
> Wednesday, March 29th, 2017 @ 6:30pm CDT
> Swissotel Conference Center - Vevey 4
> 
> We look forward to working with you, and hope to see you in Chicago at the PANIC Bar BoF.
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> David Waltermire
> Information Technology Laboratory | Computer Security Division
> National Institute of Standards and Technology
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netconf mailing list
> Netconf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com