[netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8407 (7791)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 30 January 2024 17:01 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C122C14F5FD for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:01:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.358
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WJwV9e6W4kqW for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:00:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EB96C14F6B3 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:00:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 5B59D1A3A476; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:00:59 -0800 (PST)
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: worley@alum.mit.edu, andy@yumaworks.com, netmod@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240130170059.5B59D1A3A476@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:00:59 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/ALVFsaFQzJkl-s554Lw8u6drKXA>
Subject: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8407 (7791)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 17:01:03 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8407, "Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7791 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Dale R. Worley <worley@alum.mit.edu> Section: GLOBAL Original Text ------------- There are two related items. 1) Section 3.7.1 "Security Considerations Section Template" begins X. Security Considerations The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS [RFC8446]. 2) RFC 8470 says "the latest approved template (available at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines>)". But the template at that URL says "the latest approved template (available at http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/ops/trac/wiki/yang-security-guidelines)." Corrected Text -------------- 1) It would be helpful if the beginning of the template contained a reference to RFC 8407 to provide a pointer back to where the templated section of Yang module definitions was instantiated from. Perhaps starting the template with "[Instantiated from the template of [RFC8407] section 3.7.1.]" 2) While the URL given in RFC 8407 works, the URL given in the online template only goes to a generic page, "Welcome to the IETF Community Wiki". Presumably the URL in the online template should be the URL of that page itself. Notes ----- Item (2) is a straightforward correction. Item (1) is in service to having better pointers/references in our documents. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8407 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-20) -------------------------------------- Title : Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models Publication Date : October 2018 Author(s) : A. Bierman Category : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE Source : Network Modeling Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8407 (779… RFC Errata System
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8407 … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [netmod] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8407 … mohamed.boucadair