[netmod] New Version Notification for draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements-02
"Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com> Thu, 12 March 2015 14:42 UTC
Return-Path: <evoit@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15351A0191 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dG92CnYssaja for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7513C1A1BCC for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 07:42:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1227; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1426171323; x=1427380923; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=BDOqDxufJQSqGJjeMgapsM0pqsfDeSDCUmFrgiy6RMY=; b=AyE6nLK4lDNsN9V/VKeJjdABXfllasSjZKKccFRr2GY3Syx/bOkF17OJ GByHHYKWYvzAHLdiV1EqFZIFvZ8iCmAhpdQ7DqYRzQtkBkuyXEUQCAeY7 Rd5JeqdIVMzCuYKJtyvWqMBWQIrkNhDloAHw7k4j1eUutjpekCTKNU62P Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AkBQAjpQFV/5RdJa1bgwaBMMlCAoEyTAEBAQEBAX2EEQEEOjQJAhIBKhRCJgEEDg2IJ8s3AQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBAQEBAQEZixeEQDGDHoEWAQSQJIlik3wjg26CM38BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,389,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="131399183"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2015 14:42:02 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2CEg2gt009957 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:42:02 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com ([169.254.6.70]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 09:42:02 -0500
From: "Eric Voit (evoit)" <evoit@cisco.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements-02
Thread-Index: AdBc0rCpEqkK7mM7QbCFjJQkR33CPQ==
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:42:01 +0000
Message-ID: <EF64FF31F4C4384DBCE5D513A791C2B121A1BDD8@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.134.140]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/B458ui2sPUCStf4crm6DDbo6RtI>
Subject: [netmod] New Version Notification for draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements-02
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:42:06 -0000
At IETF 91, there was much good discussion on Peer Mount. Based on these discussions we authors have split embodied concepts into two separate IETF paths:
(1) YANG Pub/Sub
draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements
draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push (was draft-netmod-clemm-datastore-push)
(2) YANG Peer Mount
draft-voit-netmod-peer-mount-requirements
draft-clemm-netmod-mount
These two concepts can stand on their own, but can also work well together. Why? Peer Mount is made more effective when remote object changes can be pushed to local applications without fetching.
At this point we authors are spending more time progressing (1) YANG Pub/Sub as it can be used standalone without Peer Mount, and also because the I2RS WG has immediate need. But (2) YANG Peer Mount is being shown effective in OpenDaylight as Network Element changes are being pushed into SDN applications. Therefore we will continue to revise the Peer Mount drafts. But we will be doing at a slower pace.
I will be at IETF 92. Reach out to me if you want to discuss. Mailing list comments to any of the drafts are also very appreciated.
Thanks,
Eric
Eric Voit
- [netmod] New Version Notification for draft-voit-… Eric Voit (evoit)