[netmod] yang 1.1 status summary
Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Wed, 21 January 2015 12:24 UTC
Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637A11A1A23 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 04:24:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.26
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.26 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1YyQA0DpThOt for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 04:24:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atlas3.jacobs-university.de (atlas3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B260E1A1A25 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 04:24:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas3.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872A1742 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:20 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas3.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.220]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id X4IeLPWIzMJC for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:05 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas3.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (demetrius4.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.49]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9134520035 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:19 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius4.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zLhPqfdBmGRm; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C0620034; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id F090E30E021F; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:16 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:15 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: netmod@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20150121122412.GB32649@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: netmod@ietf.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/DFJXaIhZ5Rf3azHYQ7RdLybVCHs>
Subject: [netmod] yang 1.1 status summary
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:24:45 -0000
Hi, here is where we are with the YANG 1.1 effort. | Status | Description | Count | |--------+----------------------------------------+-------| | NEW | new issue | 0 | | DEAD | issue has been rejected | 26 | | OPEN | open to discuss | 7 | | VRFY | proposal to verify on the list | 2 | | EDIT | waiting for Martin to do the edits | 3 | | REVIEW | waiting for the WG to review the edits | 21 | | DONE | review has completed | 0 | |--------+----------------------------------------+-------| Not surprisingly, there is a tendency for the more difficult or controversial issues to stay with us the longest. This should not cause our motivation to drop. I think it is natural that the number of issues we can move forward through the state machine is getting smaller towards the end. Here is a more list detailing where I think we are with the issues that are OPEN or that were moved to VRFY recently: * VRFY :Y09: introduce optional keys <<Y09>> -> apparently, there is no consensus, moving the state of this issue back to OPEN since we are not even in any way close to consensus * VRFY :Y16: module advertisement optimization <<Y16>> -> we may need to decide whether the netconf-capability-change notification (RFC 6470) should be augmented with a module-set-id or we want to define a more specific notification or we just provide guidance that implementations may want to sync the module-set-id after receiving a netconf-capability-change notification; left in VRFY state for now * VRFY :Y34: remove/deprecate/replace the 'anyxml' statement -> discussion on the mailing list, clarifying the difference between Y34-02 and Y34-04; left in VRFY state for now * VRFY :Y49: clarify nested submodule behavior -> moved to EDIT state * VRFY :Y59: restrict use of 64-bit numbers in XPath expressions -> moved to EDIT state * OPEN :Y18: fix "when" expression context problem -> pending action MB * OPEN :Y25: make enum numbering purely informative and optional -> pending action JS * OPEN :Y26: allow mandatory nodes in augment -> we need concrete proposals how to relax the current rules * OPEN :Y45: better conformance mechanism <<Y45>> -> some mailing list discussion, how do we make forward progress? one option might be to factor all conformance discusssion and module update rules out of the core YANG specification into a separate document - this does not solve the problem but it might help to factor it out into a separate deliverable * OPEN :Y57: non-unique leaf-list -> ready to be discussed? * OPEN :Y58: associate actions with a data node -> NETCONF seems to support a NACM update to support actions, call ending on 2015-01-22; if NETCONF supports the update, can we move this to EDIT (Andy raised the NACM update is required argument during VRFY) /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
- [netmod] yang 1.1 status summary Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [netmod] yang 1.1 status summary Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [netmod] yang 1.1 status summary Juergen Schoenwaelder
- [netmod] yang 1.1 status summary Juergen Schoenwaelder