Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6020 (3835)
Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Fri, 13 December 2013 09:37 UTC
Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93E41ADED8 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 01:37:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HOST_EQ_CZ=0.904] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fwRPXuysUFW8 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 01:37:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from trail.lhotka.name (nat-5.bravonet.cz [77.48.224.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB421A802A for <netmod@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 01:37:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81ED2540294; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:37:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from trail.lhotka.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (trail.lhotka.name [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9J5IOQSPH1nH; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:37:43 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (unknown [172.29.2.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by trail.lhotka.name (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFCEF5400BE; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:37:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, mbj@tail-f.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, david.kessens@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <20131212230639.8839D7FC177@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20131212230639.8839D7FC177@rfc-editor.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16+154~g96c0ce2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin12.3.0)
Mail-Followup-To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, mbj@tail-f.com, bclaise@cisco.com, joelja@bogus.com, j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de, david.kessens@gmail.com, jiminychris@gmail.com, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:37:37 +0100
Message-ID: <m2vbytozvi.fsf@nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: jiminychris@gmail.com, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6020 (3835)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:37:58 -0000
The text in sec. 9.4.4 also needs updating: OLD It is used to restrict the built-in type "string", or types derived from "string". NEW It is used to restrict the built-in types "string" and "binary", or types derived from them. Lada RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> writes: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6020, > "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6020&eid=3835 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Chris LaBauve <jiminychris@gmail.com> > > Section: 12 > > Original Text > ------------- > type-body-stmts = numerical-restrictions / > decimal64-specification / > string-restrictions / > enum-specification / > leafref-specification / > identityref-specification / > instance-identifier-specification / > bits-specification / > union-specification > > Corrected Text > -------------- > type-body-stmts = numerical-restrictions / > decimal64-specification / > string-restrictions / > enum-specification / > leafref-specification / > identityref-specification / > instance-identifier-specification / > bits-specification / > union-specification / > binary-specification > > binary-specification = [length-stmt stmtsep] > > Notes > ----- > Grammar rule 'type-body-stmts' does not provide for the case when type is 'binary'; this would be a rule allowing 0 or 1 length substatements according to 9.8.1. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6020 (draft-ietf-netmod-yang-13) > -------------------------------------- > Title : YANG - A Data Modeling Language for the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) > Publication Date : October 2010 > Author(s) : M. Bjorklund, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : NETCONF Data Modeling Language > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
- [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6020 (383… RFC Errata System
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6020 … Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6020 … Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6020 … Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6020 … Ladislav Lhotka
- [netmod] [Errata Verified] RFC6020 (3835) RFC Errata System