Re: [netmod] feedback draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags -> draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags

Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> Mon, 26 February 2018 23:34 UTC

Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D825212D951 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:34:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RdKVCs5wxgmn for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:34:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5016212D950 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 15:34:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pip.chopps.org (mobile-166-170-21-160.mycingular.net [166.170.21.160]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5BF462A6F; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 23:34:52 +0000 (UTC)
References: <e4b5e5eb-223d-c9ac-0567-3a8a0c05b8b0@bogus.com>
User-agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 25.3.1
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Cc: NETMOD Working Group <netmod@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <87d10rba3b.fsf@chopps.org>
In-reply-to: <e4b5e5eb-223d-c9ac-0567-3a8a0c05b8b0@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 18:34:52 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/EK7W9GcbEsXUtu_LlRtAqaD9ZWQ>
Subject: Re: [netmod] feedback draft-rtgyangdt-netmod-module-tags -> draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 23:34:56 -0000

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> writes:

> introduction / abstract should capture the problem module tags are
> attempting to solve succinctly
>
> Robert Wilton's criticism of the approach is well taken; the use of tags
> as regular configuration (his approach) vs the treatment of tags as
> exceptions (how we understand them as proposed). and seems like a ket
> architectural consideration in advancing this draft.

Hi Joel,

Yes, this seemed to have a good consensus (including myself :) and have the changes ready to go, just wanted to push the same version as proposed for adoption first.

Thanks,
Chris.

>
> joel
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod