IETF Logo Mail Archive

[netmod] Call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Sat, 22 October 2016 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477A11295B5; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:26:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3aVWaRRPRAcN; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03on0110.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.42.110]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF82B1295AA; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Lx1rLj85RF38zm9KsG9a6PJudlfhdnx3OaiZZp3PFRE=; b=GqXeToC5QkRq+LyblC0insYRVbBoc+ugSUYzDv+A9Imk5s9aIlA8qpKeNL21psBj6tzh+TsJS6iEm1thjnGLFLRndsg7GNw0KGFxQZ3M5UaafVsuEfmWM6tsM3AGTHjn0t12Cw6yg9NTprMRuM74D6LtFJWuGq/nykSip8bY+q4=
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.151) by BN3PR0501MB1443.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.160.117.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.679.5; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:26:37 +0000
Received: from BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) by BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.117.151]) with mapi id 15.01.0539.025; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:26:37 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang
Thread-Index: AQHSLGfqxxJhvU+tHkOtfdAzqX7qng==
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:26:37 +0000
Message-ID: <747256C3-E1F1-4911-AA3A-AFF1852025B2@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1b.0.161010
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kwatsen@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f796a103-87f3-446b-5e92-08d3fa7f0d1f
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN3PR0501MB1443; 7:5HDUlqdkUJRTmUA9/csEqXdl5vcd3oM3YluDwcq6JhrIOBj/iVF9//qy7Xe+mDhPtFndBp5QMyNmo54TP4aMqbydM8Yb52uRJlkQYoChzVwNloKgMxN8z2EFRE2Pdis4ZIlWf2PPTl04zfri37MjH1mpfHTLzF0FaWyeKWB2PnrB+1b5+RmTwHQPbhFTqZEvE2i4qn0LnVlHrAJEK4X09ghgMlXbql8JHKd8s5JA3J5Pr4H5FFH2mGuUtsSYG/+OLtIgK2DQ/7Zg+UkQHE++XiBJ3+17w6dPM4cgTbnyjRHu0zpleS5UuVPez2Q2pu4OWWq/9srzyzu7i/Zeql6wj0nV9AbER1g0fJ2XIaSUrZg=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1443;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN3PR0501MB1443ED27F1C57F00ACE31977A5D70@BN3PR0501MB1443.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(100405760836317)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026); SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1443; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1443;
x-forefront-prvs: 01039C93E4
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(189002)(199003)(81166006)(110136003)(106116001)(83506001)(4326007)(97736004)(68736007)(7736002)(101416001)(3660700001)(5660300001)(5002640100001)(105586002)(16236675004)(8936002)(87936001)(1730700003)(81156014)(86362001)(3846002)(102836003)(106356001)(5640700001)(450100001)(2501003)(19300405004)(2900100001)(82746002)(83716003)(8676002)(10400500002)(230783001)(36756003)(92566002)(6116002)(66066001)(15975445007)(4001350100001)(6916009)(2351001)(189998001)(99286002)(19625215002)(2906002)(229853001)(3280700002)(77096005)(7846002)(122556002)(586003)(11100500001)(19580395003)(54356999)(33656002)(50986999)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0501MB1443; H:BN3PR0501MB1442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_747256C3E1F14911AA3AAFF1852025B2junipernet_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Oct 2016 13:26:37.6181 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0501MB1443
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/GQYH-pDcvtCjxGVyyHc69s_vmUY>
Cc: "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [netmod] Call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-vlan-yang
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 13:26:40 -0000

Dear working group,

Should we move to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG item
and correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone?  Please
comment by Friday, November 4, 2016 so that the WG Chairs can gauge
whether or not there is consensus to move forward with the document.

To provide some context, please recall that this is the document that the
IEEE 802.1 had issues with being an IETF working group item.  To address
these issues, this version of the draft: is Informational, and types that
should have been defined by IEEE have now been removed.

Thanks,
Kent (as co-chair)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email