IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] [Netconf] What should a server response be? - depending on NP-containers

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Mon, 22 August 2016 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398A412B049 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 02:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r9C4LsIKrntu for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 02:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atlas3.jacobs-university.de (atlas3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD54F12B032 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 02:25:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas3.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5DF70D; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:53 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas3.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.205]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id NZcEz4SSfaB4; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas3.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.48]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDD8200A8; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:52 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius3.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OQikcwp2tpyW; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from elstar.local (elstar.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.50.231.133]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8DA200AA; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by elstar.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id CFEA33C2A555; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:50 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:25:50 +0200
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Vladimir Vassilev <vladimir@transpacket.com>
Message-ID: <20160822092550.GC12015@elstar.local>
Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Vassilev <vladimir@transpacket.com>, netmod@ietf.org
References: <m2mvkj4tvv.fsf@nic.cz> <57AC713E.8080006@transpacket.com> <20160817.102821.2247775938129211118.mbj@tail-f.com> <20160817.111343.387561472405973484.mbj@tail-f.com> <08053DE7-EF6C-4A14-B926-79723F516405@gmail.com> <20160820082922.GB9108@elstar.local> <57B890F2.9070605@transpacket.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <57B890F2.9070605@transpacket.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/HeA3EhEvEW6NbQKDJLIqWYQIiwM>
Cc: netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Netconf] What should a server response be? - depending on NP-containers
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:25:56 -0000

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 07:18:42PM +0200, Vladimir Vassilev wrote:
> On 08/20/2016 10:29 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > 
> > As document shepherd, I believe there is no strong agreement on the
> > problem and there is no concrete proposal with strong consensus for a
> > modification of the document (which is in AUTH48). In fact, there has
> > been no defect description and proposed bug fix at all on the NETMOD
> > mailing list.
> Hello,
> 
> I have strong objection to the text proposed as solution to issue #41:
>

Dear Vladimir Vassilev,

please note that we YANG 1.1 is in AUTH48 state, that is YANG 1.1 has
passed WG last call, IETF last call, and IESG approval. In other
words, we are way beyond the state in the IETF process where we
discuss the resolution of individual issues. As far as I recall from
the logs, issue #41 was closed about two years ago.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email