[netmod] [IANA #1409181] expert review for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis (yang-sid)

Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org> Tue, 17 December 2024 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@iana.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2434C14F61A; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:31:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.885
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U6qwi1ZmQjpE; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:31:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [IPv6:2620:0:2d0:201::1:81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B443C14F5E7; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 11:31:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request7.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBA3E1858; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 19:31:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request7.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5A463C11D50F; Tue, 17 Dec 2024 19:31:10 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-5.0.3-2958605-1734037763-83.1409181-37-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1409181@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-2947360-1734036950-662.1409181-37-0@icann.org> <rt-5.0.3-2958605-1734037763-83.1409181-37-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-5.0.3-795338-1734463870-794.1409181-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1409181
X-Managed-BY: RT 5.0.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 19:31:10 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: M4SIDX2H3HRPYU2QW5WX2JOBF3GI7Y2F
X-Message-ID-Hash: M4SIDX2H3HRPYU2QW5WX2JOBF3GI7Y2F
X-MailFrom: iana-shared@iana.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netmod.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: netmod@ietf.org, michel.veillette@trilliant.com, laurent.toutain@imt-atlantique.fr, draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis.all@ietf.org, alexander.pelov@imt-atlantique.fr
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review@iana.org
Subject: [netmod] [IANA #1409181] expert review for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis (yang-sid)
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/IdKM8YSFzIEKn7dR0UnwMo63hug>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netmod-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netmod-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netmod-leave@ietf.org>

Dear Michel, Alexander, Laurent (authors and netmod WG in copy),

Resending this question about updating references in the IETF YANG-SID Ranges registry. This is related to a document on Thursday's IESG telechat agenda.

thanks,

Amanda Baber
IANA Operations Manager

On Thu Dec 12 21:09:23 2024, amanda.baber wrote:
> Dear Michel, Alexander, Laurent (authors and netmod WG in copy),
> 
> IANA has a YANG-SID-related question about a document on next
> Thursday's IESG telechat agenda.
> 
> This document is obsoleting RFC 6691 and updating its YANG modules:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-17
> 
> The IETF YANG-SID Ranges registry lists RFC 6691 as the reference for
> ietf-yang-types and ietf-inet-types. We asked the author whether we
> should update those references (as is typical when a document being
> obsoleted), but he wasn't sure, since those entries were added after
> 6691 was published.
> 
> If the IESG approves 6691-bis for publication, should we replace the
> references to 6691 in the IETF YANG-SID Ranges registry? Please see
> 
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-sid
> 
> When this document is approved, we'll continue to list the original
> RFC 6691 modules as well as the new ones in the YANG Module Names
> registry. (This is not our standard approach to obsoletions, but we
> were asked to do this for YANG modules.)
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Amanda Baber
> IANA Operations Manager