Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Tue, 21 March 2017 20:22 UTC
Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB33D129BE8 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6rdSpSyC76d0 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:22:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDAD71296D5 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (h-148-188.a165.priv.bahnhof.se [176.10.148.188]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 984DF1AE0310; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:22:54 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:22:54 +0100
Message-Id: <20170321.212254.1381357367952499259.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: worley@ariadne.com
Cc: lhotka@nic.cz, netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <87shm6tn2w.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
References: <20170321.144353.1304796463767741047.mbj@tail-f.com> <87shm6tn2w.fsf@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Iub0tbQH5wQDfS9o-prypHtTgog>
Subject: Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 20:22:59 -0000
worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) wrote: > Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> writes: > > Hmm, "*" was choosen b/c people are used to read it as > > "zero or more". So for example: > > > > +---c server* [name] > > +--c name string > > ... > > > > means zero or more "server" elements. Each indexed by "name". > > From RFC 7223: > > module ietf-interfaces { > ... > container interfaces { > ... > list interface { > key "name"; > > leaf name { > type string; > } > > leaf description { > type string; > } > ... > > There is a top-level container node "interfaces", which contains a list > node "interface", which contains a sequence of list elements which > consist of groups of (a leaf "name", a leaf "description", etc.), which > elements are indexed by the value of the "name" leaf. Aha, ok. This description is not a correct description of the YANG data tree (in which XPath expressions etc are evaluated). There is not a single "list node" called "interfaces". Look at an example of an XML instance document: <interfaces> <interface> <name>eth0</name> ... </interface> <interface> <name>eth1</name> ... </interface> </interfaces> This also reflects the data tree. /martin
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Thomas Morin
- [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Dale R. Worley
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Phil Shafer
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Dale R. Worley
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Phil Shafer
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] tree diagrams - flags Dale R. Worley