IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09 (until Oct 27, 2016)

Dean Bogdanovic <ivandean@gmail.com> Fri, 11 November 2016 06:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ivandean@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BFC1299BF for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:45:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YEsFjkIJZI_X for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:45:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF85D129606 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:45:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id d2so6902006pfd.0 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:45:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=MMcuGfwyRwuPyx/6OcwkczkocPH6Dctyi4VfElXRvBs=; b=kTq2VCpBAKyF2GjY5vizzU4PKbdvwW4/HveqvLD0RDn9oZJdKxzBmtT99e9HWNI956 3+zHaPGMW3YLHfExeABZFbFPetWlg7a7sbaPTYhTf8jw8I2x+pgDHrKCAiYUdsZkrjLN HQQD/mlIn7Z5C9z6pZAPjba0NGsYkqGbRS4KL4sHZk4DKul3M+bQe+XqYNQA+yuKc4/U we7kh0xmBi34+R8QylGHe3aXLkYAZbhRbRkLkENYpY6/F3w7+ejqzfoww+Rdxau2AdNL AHe7MkKvfSOvuJV46DAZSzKV5zt9A6h5Np0VFVDd7PjwfdzGUMhZGumadnyWDZYIINNv cLbA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=MMcuGfwyRwuPyx/6OcwkczkocPH6Dctyi4VfElXRvBs=; b=hwVTQbSV3MxMxnevdqWG94k0uxOdBrXCDEV7bVAthzTuFX+4+qxuVLN3BUQCOAbtQ7 COIc7Jm2MqpVKIPVT8o9SRRKMqJWWlh1JSSf6ni0wrriHZAgEdpg3rbh814aYcxGhTBC d3Je8IM5Zhr0+L5gTCS2T6CVZBM+qTO23OriV2ZMyFtW46fpEp/GrvbNu4vOefUl2fhc DjKsElCh+vJ8hB0pDBDYkPxzC6O/DUffjmPJactvohbnMiOxbXcehDxCdzXanplv92Ll TdyzxZlDHRnwUnQeqmbJBNYIPU52gTbVxYiYQmE3Y/ZuoTxYKbilNuzpZkbNIwv7aWJL /5iQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcZp4pnDIbM8wwpDnjtTcyAXVVwU3F7Ko8ylu3sQ9xUtbRHpZGMgwzaW019AsfeIQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.144.65 with SMTP id a62mr42423607pge.103.1478846732066; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:45:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.20.0.73] (113x41x139x141.ap113.ftth.ucom.ne.jp. [113.41.139.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id xt4sm9705115pac.25.2016.11.10.22.45.30 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 22:45:31 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FF5B8BF1-9092-46BE-90C4-E757BA92410D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Dean Bogdanovic <ivandean@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C48CCBEA-3E40-4052-A4C6-84D28E3F11F9@juniper.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 15:45:29 +0900
Message-Id: <AACD7EE0-AA45-48F6-8468-99DB7FC96A7C@gmail.com>
References: <D99D54F3-C0D3-471C-81C5-9D534C316B66@juniper.net> <C48CCBEA-3E40-4052-A4C6-84D28E3F11F9@juniper.net>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/IvvbbLuDHtFhDeZjwwW_fskPu_Q>
Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09 (until Oct 27, 2016)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 06:45:35 -0000

> On Oct 29, 2016, at 4:01 AM, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> The last call period for this draft has ended.   Thank you to all that responded.  Given the responses received, my co-chair and I believe that the draft is ready to move forward.  I will begin the shepherd write-up shortly.
> In parallel, prompted by a conversation I had this morning, I’m wondering about the YANG module’s use of the config false nodes ‘acl-oper-data’ and ‘ace-oper-data’.  In particular, are the lifetimes of these nodes always the same as the configured nodes? 

Yes, they are. When the nodes are created, they are don’t have to be attached to an another object, like interface or RIB, etc, but they get operational state. Once attached, (to continue with the example) operational status of counters is changing. When detached from the interface, the last know counter is kept, until the ace is deleted. Same is for acl-oper-data.

> - is there any need to support reporting opstate for system-generated acts?

Don’t understand your question. What is the difference between system and user generated acls?

Dean

> 
> Thanks,
> Kent (as shepherd)
>  
>  
> From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net <mailto:kwatsen@juniper.net>>
> Date: Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 5:05 PM
> To: "netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>" <netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>>
> Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09 (until Oct 27, 2016)
>  
>  
> This is a notice to start a two-week NETMOD WG last call for the document:
>  
>                Network Access Control List (ACL) YANG Data Model
>                https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09>
>  
> Please indicate your support or concerns by Thursday, October 27, 2016.
>  
> We are particularly interested in statements of the form:
>   * I have reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09 and found no issues.
>   * I have reviewed draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09 and found the following issues: ...
>  
> As well as:
>  * I have implemented the data model in draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09.
>   * I am implementing the data model in draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09.
>   * I am considering to implement the data model in draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09.
>   * I am not considering to implement the data model in draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-09.
>  
> Thank you,
> NETMOD WG Chairs
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email