IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-05.txt

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Thu, 18 May 2017 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33299129C04 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 May 2017 05:32:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nic.cz
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rgx14sY6DXap for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 May 2017 05:32:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [217.31.204.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95524129BCF for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 May 2017 05:27:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:718:1a02:1:29bc:1757:64a4:7d47] (unknown [IPv6:2001:718:1a02:1:29bc:1757:64a4:7d47]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFB3E6010D; Thu, 18 May 2017 14:27:16 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1495110437; bh=6ByTgwyXKqh8jKB6V8FH7pR05rJGEjhnsIWrVcFqHRE=; h=From:Date:To; b=E8utiXh5TlDyCV7+I1NTSoj2cu2SS29SCni+we4EJimPJLbSjRMPASvkQVGWugRMm 2SBhi3mT31pJjr5hUDiZAPuAdyUTKwpwR5NbM3PkiL/zjAgiqN+l4DEuHiHM/+oRhk R/7K1jMTLXiHlQrZmDErzLkUCiO2Zs6hHgcEEx9E=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <6ffcbc1a-3715-01de-361f-318f17aaddce@labn.net>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 14:27:16 +0200
Cc: Martin Björklund <mbj@tail-f.com>, Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>, netmod@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <867157A7-EB1A-4A1C-BC08-3DA4F47B64CB@nic.cz>
References: <149493700012.11951.17167734464796184887@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170516.142434.78646315149686396.mbj@tail-f.com> <CABCOCHSBp3v29k2S9HthUVx4GRBnYm4apeuXB6XrZBqeD1s0xQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170517.094657.1191825685767676391.mbj@tail-f.com> <6ffcbc1a-3715-01de-361f-318f17aaddce@labn.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/JF32kXF_mbf9fQMkwBkVV8iP4XQ>
Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-05.txt
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 12:32:45 -0000

> On 18 May 2017, at 14:17, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/17/2017 3:46 AM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>>> Also open issue B.3 says design time mounts are not supported yet but
>>> sec 1 (Intro) says they are out of scope:
>>> 
>>>    The schema mount mechanism defined in this document provides support
>>>    only for the latter two cases because design-time definition of the
>>>    mounted schema doesn't play well with the existing YANG modularity
>>>    mechanisms.  For example, it would be impossible to augment the
>>>    mounted data model.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I agree with sec 1. Leave them out of scope.
>>> 
>> I also agree.  This is open until we have WG consensus.
> 
> (As contributor) 
> I'm fine with leaving such support out of scope for this document, but disagree with the text.  How about just keeping it simple and say:
>   The schema mount mechanism defined in this document provides support
>    only for the latter two cases, i.e., design-time mounts are not specified by this document.

Fine with me.

Lada

> 
> Lou
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email