Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Sat, 06 October 2018 04:35 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E8E130E44; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 21:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UjBvjKBGJz7A; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 21:35:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8364A130DC5; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 21:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1796; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1538800542; x=1540010142; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9HgSQA4AE/6Dt824P/wkMjEyM/Hy7dP1+oLxzkdZjwo=; b=GWhr0exZQqTB6b98n9XvhK2wx3tyirQcBkj/JDtdu9Efc3vd/OT6QmDV CYM3WMhf9qLVYQxyvVy1YZy+Z36YuS8uqY0Dolnq7AUQ7IYqJcJSezpFP MKkKu19khcGFWcnjl20xDrb6bWGJ6l8R+UbGeIdqnuk0HM1877N/Hv9Ku I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AmAADPOrhb/xbLJq1jGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBVAIBAQEBCwGCa20SKASDcIh0pEqBZg0jhEkChFA3Cg0BAwE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAgEBAm0cDIU6BiMVPAUQCw4MAiYCAlcGAQwIAQGDHQGCAQ+kJoEuhHeFIYE?= =?us-ascii?q?Lij6BQT+BEieCa4MQCwKBLgESAYMgglcCiEeGHY8FCYZMiXQGF4FNS4Qagme?= =?us-ascii?q?GXIwkgx+GKoFYImRxMxoIGxU7gm0Iiw6FQD0xiwiCPgEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,347,1534809600"; d="scan'208";a="6977816"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Oct 2018 04:35:40 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w964ZdUc026355; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 04:35:40 GMT
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Balazs Lengyel <balazs.lengyel@ericsson.com>
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <44adc67a-6e29-423e-6155-0a9db4797500@labn.net>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <c82f9988-04aa-25ee-f9e1-4ee6b589f083@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 06:35:39 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <44adc67a-6e29-423e-6155-0a9db4797500@labn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.55.221.36, ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/KHS8Dw3-iF_375S2gWfYPXHk5cY>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2018 04:35:46 -0000

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"

Regards, B.
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of preparation for WG Adoption
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> NetMod WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
>
>
> .
>