Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5274)
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Mon, 05 March 2018 13:47 UTC
Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DDA12D777 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 05:47:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jNs089w8_mMW for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 05:47:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EA0120454 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 05:47:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [173.38.220.45]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D23C81AE02EF; Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:47:14 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 14:47:14 +0100
Message-Id: <20180305.144714.1993451337018243576.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Cc: bclaise@cisco.com, warren@kumari.net, joelja@bogus.com, kwatsen@juniper.net, lberger@labn.net, netmod@ietf.org
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <20180304033819.5E8EAB8198E@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20180304033819.5E8EAB8198E@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/KITCri_rLMX-bj0zHje_3MxkrcU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5274)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2018 13:47:18 -0000
Hi, This errata is correct and should be accepted. I think the actual URI to use is less important, so the proposed URI is fine. /martin RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950, > "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5274 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> > > Section: 7.16.3 > > Original Text > ------------- > A corresponding XML instance example of the complete notification: > > <notification > xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0"> > <eventTime>2008-07-08T00:01:00Z</eventTime> > <event xmlns="urn:example:event"> > <event-class>fault</event-class> > <reporting-entity> > /ex:interface[ex:name='Ethernet0'] > </reporting-entity> > <severity>major</severity> > </event> > </notification> > > Corrected Text > -------------- > A corresponding XML instance example of the complete notification > follows. This example reports an event for an interface from the > "example-foo" module defined in Section 13.1.1. > > <notification > xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:notification:1.0"> > <eventTime>2008-07-08T00:01:00Z</eventTime> > <event xmlns="urn:example:event"> > <event-class>fault</event-class> > <reporting-entity xmlns:ex="urn:example:foo"> > /ex:interface[ex:name='Ethernet0'] > </reporting-entity> > <severity>major</severity> > </event> > </notification> > > > Notes > ----- > The "ex" prefix is not declared. The "example-foo" module in 13.1.1 is the only module in the draft that matches the given instance-identifier. An alternative fix would be to use a different module and a matching instance-identifier. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14) > -------------------------------------- > Title : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language > Publication Date : August 2016 > Author(s) : M. Bjorklund, Ed. > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Network Modeling > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
- [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (527… RFC Errata System
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Martin Bjorklund