IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft

"Zhuangyan (Yan)" <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com> Tue, 08 March 2016 03:25 UTC

Return-Path: <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689CC1CDB40 for <netmod@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:25:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.41]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6YDOWtlV_mJv for <netmod@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:25:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD68C1CDB3F for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:25:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CFL53668; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 03:25:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.33) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 03:25:44 +0000
Received: from NKGEML513-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.112]) by nkgeml402-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 8 Mar 2016 11:25:36 +0800
From: "Zhuangyan (Yan)" <zhuangyan.zhuang@huawei.com>
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft
Thread-Index: AQHRc0XzOmgxKIY1jkmkuTyx7LV2V59Oz5EQ
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 03:25:36 +0000
Message-ID: <9B4BC45FDEDDD84F813E9E4A5BAF8785941CF67E@nkgeml513-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <FEF60153-75D1-463E-82D4-40ECDFCF3D34@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <FEF60153-75D1-463E-82D4-40ECDFCF3D34@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.135.170.230]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9B4BC45FDEDDD84F813E9E4A5BAF8785941CF67Enkgeml513mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.56DE4639.0085, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.1.112, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 28327137114706db6f692c780a0201dc
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/Kp9k_As8B9_LQTQ0wXzuUiab2pM>
Subject: Re: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 03:25:49 -0000

Sorry for the late response. It took some time to review this draft and models.  And Yes, I support adopting this document as a WG item.

To me, the common model is something useful. There perhaps some overlaps in Ethernet-like model with things in IEEE. If yes, we’ll see how to cooperate.



Best Regards,



Yan

发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Kent Watsen
发送时间: 2016年3月1日 7:07
收件人: netmod@ietf.org
主题: Re: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft


The chairs were just reviewing notes and realized that this thread never closed properly.

Juergen has some concerns regarding realistic milestones, that were never addressed.  Robert, can you please try to address Juergen’s concerns now?

Also, there were only a two responses before indicating willingness to review the draft as it progresses (thanks Dan and Martin).  Can others that support this draft and willing to review this draft say so?

Thanks,
Netmod Chairs


From: netmod <netmod-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net<mailto:kwatsen@juniper.net>>
Date: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 11:48 AM
To: "netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>" <netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>>
Subject: [netmod] call for consensus to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as NETMOD WG draft


The minutes for IETF 94 show that there was in-room support for adopting draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG draft.   The minutes also show that this decision would be confirmed on the mailing list, which I am doing now.

Should we move to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG item and correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone?  Please comment by Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 9AM EST at which time the WG Chairs will gauge whether or not there is consensus to move forward with the document.

Thanks,
Kent

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email