[netmod] FW: Lisa's Apps area Activity Report for Jan 2009

"David Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net> Mon, 02 February 2009 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <netmod-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: netmod-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-netmod-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626DF3A6825; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:27:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: netmod@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865E23A6825 for <netmod@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:27:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.197, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AoX6fNh8ChfT for <netmod@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:27:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.96]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189BB3A6933 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.20]) by QMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id B5ie1b00a0SCNGk598TNuG; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:27:22 +0000
Received: from Harrington73653 ([24.147.240.21]) by OMTA09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id B8TN1b00G0UQ6dC3V8TNyP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:27:22 +0000
From: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: netmod@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:27:21 -0500
Message-ID: <03a001c98574$a6a96670$0600a8c0@china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03A1_01C9854A.BDD35E70"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Thread-Index: AcmFbWifuVHcjq6sQ+mkDUYIbhMMIAABg8kQ
Subject: [netmod] FW: Lisa's Apps area Activity Report for Jan 2009
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/netmod>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netmod-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: netmod-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,
 
Thought I would point out that there is a YAM BOF being consdiered for
ietf74 (see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/YamCharter)
 
If you want to call YANG models YAMs, you probably should move to
protect the acronym from other IETF usage. You will probably need to
demonstrate a WG consensus to adopt that term for YANG models.
 
Personally, i think anything based on "yet another" is likely to
continually hit conflicts. 
I think for the users of yang models, who probably already have
experience in SMI MIBs, it will be apparent what a YANG MIB would be -
a management information base written using YANG. YMMV
 
dbh

  _____  

From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org
[mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2009 1:45 PM
To: Lisa Dusseault's Chairs; Apps Discuss
Subject: Lisa's Apps area Activity Report for Jan 2009



News, Updates
Quite a few BOFs getting requested for the next meeting, see
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki for more details on each:
 - OAUTH - charter revised recently on list
 - YAM, BOF on advancing core email standards
 - MMOX, BOF on Massive Multiplayer Online Interactions
 - XMPP, revising base specs and doing some transport and security
stuff
 - Interest in other HTTP topics: Cookies, Origin header -- not sure
if there will be a BOF around this

The BOF approval call is Feb 5 and scheduling of these BOFs will
happen after that.


Document Status and Progress
Active documents, my action:

Active documents, waiting on other:
 - draft-reschke-webdav-post (Exp): Cyrus Daboo is doing shepherd
review and writeup
 - drat-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn (Exp): Waiting on revision from
authors
 - draft-ietf-sieve-mime-loop (PS): Waiting on authors to respond to
GenArt review
 - draft-ietf-usefor-usepro (PS): Waiting for last WG issue to get
resolved
 - draft-ietf-calsify-2446bis (PS): Waiting for a revision
 - draft-ietf-calsify-rfc2445bis (PS): Waiting for a revision
 - draft-snell-atompub-bidi (PS): Waiting for a revision
 - draft-wilde-sms-uri (PS): Waiting for a revision

Finished processing -- new in RFC Ed queue and new RFCs
 - draft-melnikov-sieve-imapext-metadata (PS): approved, announcement
sent
 - draft-freed-sieve-ihave (PS): In RFC Ed queue
 - draft-ietf-sieve-managesieve (PS): In RFC Ed queue
 - draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header (PS): In RFC Ed queue

WG Status

ALTO, HTTPBIS, IDNABIS and SIEVE are meeting in SF / IETF74

ALTO: mostly quiet 
CALSIFY: Working through open issues
HTTPBIS: Interesting issues and great discussion on "Origin" header or
other fix/replacement to "Referer" header
IDNABIS: Great discussion on goals and tradeoffs e.g. simplicity and
invariability of assignments
SIEVE: Published several documents and pushing more through
USEFOR: Prompted the WG last week to close their last one or two
issues, to finish their last doc
--- Scanned by M+ Guardian Messaging Firewall --- Messaging Architects
sponsors The Spamhaus Project. 
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod