Re: [netmod] [apps-discuss] Apps Area review of draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10

Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz> Thu, 02 May 2013 07:33 UTC

Return-Path: <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3551421F890F for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2013 00:33:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.101
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_50=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b6jMJB2BE48r for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 May 2013 00:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C22E21F86D3 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 May 2013 00:33:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.42.12] (89-24-17-96.i4g.tmcz.cz [89.24.17.96]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B29713F7DA for <netmod@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 May 2013 09:33:45 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1367480025; bh=Ur0N80j0eDoE5mw53BXlZnOVJZioYKXW3n5rZ45VpX0=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=OPY/CrfoOsvu7sTWqzAMPcAwzx/F1+PJn74Ft0hBpzSQ71L359t754b95Gb6l7tQ4 kJ5hhsbYnGM5u/tJIxBjR+QRqojSNgouDDpHibcqa7QIQYtla3b70c8exfMirz3pPT NzkQtYTJkpAyvAc7qBuRCFnlQV1wgeeCNV03n94I=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20130430.103839.1231060720297181226.mbj@tail-f.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 09:33:43 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A41FA0A0-B1B6-4ABD-B35C-49D9F04F5238@nic.cz>
References: <CAHBU6iu_BzHCJxJnXCEU_fRuwkp=UghLwG7hsgaMKMFSq=yzag@mail.gmail.com> <20130430.103839.1231060720297181226.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.7 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [netmod] [apps-discuss] Apps Area review of draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 07:33:47 -0000

[switched to NETMOD list]

On Apr 30, 2013, at 10:38 AM, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote:

>> 3.1 “The data model for interfaces presented in this document uses a flat
>> list of interfaces.” - does this mean that the model in section 3. should
>> have “interface*” rather than just “interface” as a child of “interfaces”?
> 
> In this tree diagram, the notion "interface [name]" means that it is a
> YANG list, with "name" as key.

But what about keyless list, i.e. operational state? They are indistinguishable from containers, so I'd suggest to append '*' to their names as well.

Lada

--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C