IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module status and plans

Vladimir Vassilev <vladimir@transpacket.com> Fri, 23 June 2017 17:14 UTC

Return-Path: <vladimir@transpacket.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6486C12762F; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uZxlcn4BsGYD; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.transpacket.com (s91205186171.blix.com [91.205.186.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 882C91270A3; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 10:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.transpacket.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D1F31005B5; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 19:14:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.transpacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.transpacket.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 3njqMaplxRXw; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 19:14:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.transpacket.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5D931005B8; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 19:14:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.transpacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.transpacket.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id OjVQdxjFNV-W; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 19:14:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.209.116] (s1853520235.blix.com [185.35.202.35]) by mail.transpacket.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29ADE31005B5; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 19:14:41 +0200 (CEST)
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, William Lupton <wlupton@broadband-forum.org>
References: <4873921A-9782-4943-A076-C8D9E79E3991@broadband-forum.org> <d5bda3ec-bd40-272f-a33b-97d67d0b4ba7@cisco.com> <C0D62C49-7993-4365-8452-435E66292869@broadband-forum.org> <AAD21A6D-A54F-473D-BFA0-E7241A8B8E97@juniper.net>
Cc: "ccamp-chairs@ietf.org" <ccamp-chairs@ietf.org>, "Deborah Brungard (dbrungard@att.com)" <dbrungard@att.com>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, stefan vallin <stefan@wallan.se>
From: Vladimir Vassilev <vladimir@transpacket.com>
Message-ID: <9bdc2746-346f-9288-ba2b-f738896373fb@transpacket.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 19:14:40 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AAD21A6D-A54F-473D-BFA0-E7241A8B8E97@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/QCXR4jjVjEu864YO84Eje3THMgM>
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module status and plans
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 17:14:46 -0000

Hi Kent,

I followed the CCAMP thread concluding with 
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/current/msg18142.html and 
IMO there is consensus that the draft should be move back to netmod.

Vladimir


On 06/22/2017 03:02 PM, Kent Watsen wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> Please be aware that this draft is moving to the CCAMP WG.  I don't think the ccamp-version of the draft has been posted yet, but it will be discussed in that WG (and not NETMOD) in Prague.
>
> Regards,
> Kent
>
>
>> On Jun 22, 2017, at 6:25 AM, William Lupton <wlupton@broadband-forum.org> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> We at the Broadband Forum (BBF) would like to reiterate our interest in the draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module draft.
>>
>> We will also have some technical comments / suggestions (internal discussion is ongoing) that we will share with NETMOD as soon as possible.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> William
>>
>>> On 31 May 2017, at 13:08, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> William,
>>>
>>> This was discussed with the authors, the NETMOD chairs, and the RTG AD Deborah.
>>> The advice was for the authors to raise the draft in ccamp and try to progress it there.
>>>
>>> The authors updated their draft to version 2 and pinged the CCAMP mailing list (https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/current/msg18124.html).
>>>  From that email thread, it seems there is interest in the work, but where to do the work is not clear.
>>>
>>> My advice to the authors: continue progress this work and if CCAMP is not interested or consider this work too generic, bring it back to NETMOD and we'll follow normal WG process.
>>>
>>> Regards, Benoit
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> I heard from Kent that https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vallin-netmod-alarm-module was moving to CCAMP but I don’t see any mention of it at https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/documents (although it is shown as a dependency at https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ccamp/deps/svg). Is any more info available please?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> William
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email