[netmod] Re: liaison response to LS 1818
Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Wed, 14 May 2025 22:11 UTC
Return-Path: <01000196d0da593e-fe5c9490-6b37-469c-a15a-a70443c91b8b-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: netmod@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5AAE28AB0A4 for <netmod@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 14 May 2025 15:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SxpqnA3V5d1g for <netmod@mail2.ietf.org>; Wed, 14 May 2025 15:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a8-31.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-31.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.31]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52E3B28AB099 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 May 2025 15:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=6gbrjpgwjskckoa6a5zn6fwqkn67xbtw; d=amazonses.com; t=1747260692; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=HRm2Jd/HoJNa//SiypoFHXnq7fWir8yIJjBH1RlfB14=; b=gem7XAb5LMvEJatDyMXY8bc8sZU5Znv+NB3e5qBaAHtzpsvHQa7fUtx62v9xDTKz ixkdh/+ng4zmgerZhZGQDVWhIlWKNfjnlNkBPTNBOJVCa1xsb9HETO7LZ0T3UuoPRkj +ftnY1UiqXUIvZ1auja/Ru8M/lE/xX9p0wC8Ffbg=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <01000196d0da593e-fe5c9490-6b37-469c-a15a-a70443c91b8b-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C0D2357F-45BA-4B09-AFF2-23E604169387"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\))
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 22:11:32 +0000
In-Reply-To: <5403C79E-6D15-4A1A-817D-50593BCAF060@cisco.com>
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <01000196b289fb44-6a0396b4-cc29-40a6-9b51-e8b5146461c0-000000@email.amazonses.com> <C67FE81D-CE78-4700-8C79-CA392EFABA15@cisco.com> <01000196cba61dad-c20b228e-e90c-4159-829b-5f9d142bb8df-000000@email.amazonses.com> <5403C79E-6D15-4A1A-817D-50593BCAF060@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31)
Feedback-ID: ::1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
X-SES-Outgoing: 2025.05.14-54.240.8.31
Message-ID-Hash: FCT6CNMUUB3O7557G5ATQBTDGXZ7GNLJ
X-Message-ID-Hash: FCT6CNMUUB3O7557G5ATQBTDGXZ7GNLJ
X-MailFrom: 01000196d0da593e-fe5c9490-6b37-469c-a15a-a70443c91b8b-000000@amazonses.watsen.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-netmod.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [netmod] Re: liaison response to LS 1818
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/R3MVUWAY2FNglbcYi1FCkUcZfjo>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:netmod-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:netmod-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:netmod-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Charles, > Yes, it is, and unless there are specific questions or concerns for which answers or feedback is needed, sending for information is appropriate. This LS will actually be sent in reply to the previous LS from 3GPP, and there is no need to specify any actions or deadlines. Then let's just share for information (no action). > >> However, if it's expected to give them a chance to respond, then I'd say by email to the NETMOD list (CC-ed) within two weeks. Please note that one draft is already post-WGLC, so it's already a little too late but, if needed, I (as chair) will hold it for two-weeks to give them time to respond. >> >> Please advise. > > We can simply say that an email to the NETMOD list is the best and most timely way to provide any feedback. If I understand correctly, this statement is unnecessary if just sharing for information (no action) - correct? If it's a case of "it doesn't hurt", then it seems fine to include this statement as well. >> >>> The text on this email is not the same as that at https://github.com/rgwilton/3gpp_liaison_response/blob/main/draft-liaison-response.md. I have some editorial suggestions but did not want to provide them against an out-of-date version. I can share them in a draft version of the 3GPP document that would be used to provide the LS, if that is preferred. >> >> Correct. I updated Rob's text to better reflect current status. If using a draft version of the 3GPP document, would diffs be visible? If not, maybe send text-edits to the list (e.g., OLD/NEW) or use a burner HedgeDoc page? > > I can copy/paste the text provided in this email into a Word document formatted as a 3GPP contribution and provide that with change tracking enabled to highlight my suggested changes. > Let me know if this all sounds ok. Are you proposing to send a Word doc w/ change-tracking enabled to the netmod list? How about doing both: - attached a Word doc w/ change-tracking enabled (to act as a diff) - copy/paste email's body (to act as the "please review this" text) > Cheers, > Charles Likewise, Kent
- [netmod] liaison response to LS 1818 Kent Watsen
- [netmod] Re: liaison response to LS 1818 Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- [netmod] Re: liaison response to LS 1818 Kent Watsen
- [netmod] Re: liaison response to LS 1818 Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- [netmod] Re: liaison response to LS 1818 Kent Watsen
- [netmod] Re: liaison response to LS 1818 Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- [netmod] Re: liaison response to LS 1818 Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- [netmod] Re: liaison response to LS 1818 Kent Watsen