Re: [netmod] bit positions
Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> Wed, 19 December 2018 12:42 UTC
Return-Path: <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AACE130934 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:42:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vVVTlqyvMTF5 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:42:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de (atlas5.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6929812D4ED for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 04:42:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (demetrius5.irc-it.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F112BFD9; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 13:42:48 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from atlas5.jacobs-university.de ([10.70.0.217]) by localhost (demetrius5.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.222]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id ipLSZOVXek0x; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 13:42:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de (hermes.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hermes.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "Jacobs University CA - G01" (verified OK)) by atlas5.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 13:42:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.46]) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EA520045; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 13:42:48 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at jacobs-university.de
Received: from hermes.jacobs-university.de ([212.201.44.23]) by localhost (demetrius1.jacobs-university.de [212.201.44.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kyM3n9HHBQ5k; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 13:42:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from exchange.jacobs-university.de (SXCHMB02.jacobs.jacobs-university.de [10.70.0.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "exchange.jacobs-university.de", Issuer "DFN-Verein Global Issuing CA" (verified OK)) by hermes.jacobs-university.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7846C20044; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 13:42:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from anna.localdomain (10.50.218.117) by sxchmb03.jacobs.jacobs-university.de (10.70.0.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.1591.10; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 13:42:47 +0100
Received: by anna.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 501) id A7B483005040F7; Wed, 19 Dec 2018 13:42:47 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 13:42:46 +0100
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
CC: NETMOD WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20181219124246.lvkiwofmq6wk4p5o@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
Reply-To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, NETMOD WG <netmod@ietf.org>
References: <0e6b0f62bbea33615a77d909dfde7098372f889b.camel@nic.cz> <20181219121617.7galbbhjy4bgqyo4@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <f4c1f95ede2f36f2c41adb5ed95d011f49ffd297.camel@nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f4c1f95ede2f36f2c41adb5ed95d011f49ffd297.camel@nic.cz>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
X-ClientProxiedBy: SXCHMB01.jacobs.jacobs-university.de (10.70.0.120) To sxchmb03.jacobs.jacobs-university.de (10.70.0.155)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/SWAl0_4eNfwlVk9yBp-3TPVILWU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] bit positions
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 12:42:52 -0000
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 01:35:02PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > On Wed, 2018-12-19 at 13:16 +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > Lada, > > > > RFC 7950 says: > > > > The "position" statement, which is optional, takes as an argument a > > non-negative integer value that specifies the bit's position within a > > hypothetical bit field. The position value MUST be in the range 0 to > > 4294967295, and it MUST be unique within the bits type. > > > > Neither the XML nor the JSON encoding rulse uses the position > > property. I believe the interpretation of the position field is going > > to be protocol specific. DNS may do things in its own way, a CBOR > > encoding of bits may do a different thing. > > So do you suggest to keep the position equal to the number in the IANA registry? > That seems to be the most obvious thing to do. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
- [netmod] bit positions Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] bit positions Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] bit positions Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] bit positions Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [netmod] bit positions Ladislav Lhotka